Pfizer Global Research and Development, New London, Connecticut, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Feb;30(2):127-35. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.2.127.
To characterize the effect of oral ziprasidone and haloperidol on the corrected QT (QTc) interval under steady-state conditions. Design. Prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study.
Inpatient clinical research facility. Patients Fifty-nine adults (age range 25-59 yrs) with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had no clinically significant abnormality on electrocardiogram (ECG) at screening. Intervention. During period 1 (days -10 to -4), antipsychotic and anticholinergic drugs were tapered. On the first day (day -3) of period 2, the drugs were discontinued, and placebo was given for the next 3 days (days -2 to 0). On the last day (day 0) of period 2, serial baseline ECGs were collected. During period 3 (days 1-16), patients received escalating oral doses of ziprasidone and haloperidol to reach steady state. Period 4 (days 17-19) allowed for study drug washout and initiation of outpatient antipsychotic therapy; safety assessments were also performed during this period.
At each steady-state dose level, three ECGs and a serum or plasma sample were collected at the predicted time of peak exposure to the administered drug. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined for the mean QTc interval at baseline and for the mean change from baseline in QTc at each steady-state dose level. Mean changes from baseline in the QTc interval (msec) for ziprasidone were 4.5 (95% CI 1.9-7.1), 19.5 (95% CI 15.5-23.4), and 22.5 (95% CI 15.7- 29.4) for steady-state doses of 40, 160, and 320 mg/day, respectively; for haloperidol, -1.2 (95% CI -4.1-1.7), 6.6 (95% CI 1.6-11.7), and 7.2 (95% CI 1.4-13.1) for steady-state doses of 2.5, 15, and 30 mg/day. Although no patient in either treatment group experienced a QTc interval of 450 msec or greater, the QTc interval increased 30 msec or more in 11 and 17 ziprasidone-treated patients at 160 and 320 mg/day, respectively, and in 3 and 5 haloperidol-treated patients at 15 and 30 mg/day, respectively. Most treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions were mild in intensity, and none were severe.
The QTc interval in ziprasidone- and haloperidol-treated patients increased with dose. Treatment with high doses of ziprasidone or haloperidol did not result in any patient experiencing a QTc interval of 450 msec or greater.
在稳态条件下,描述口服齐拉西酮和氟哌啶醇对校正 QT(QTc)间期的影响。设计:前瞻性、随机、开放标签、平行组研究。
住院临床研究设施。
59 名成年人(年龄 25-59 岁),患有精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍,在筛查时心电图(ECG)无明显异常。
在第 1 期(-10 至-4 天)期间,逐渐减少抗精神病药和抗胆碱能药物的剂量。在第 2 期的第一天(-3 天),停止使用药物,并在接下来的 3 天(-2 至 0 天)给予安慰剂。在第 2 期的最后一天(0 天),收集连续的基线 ECG。在第 3 期(第 1 至 16 天),患者接受递增口服剂量的齐拉西酮和氟哌啶醇以达到稳态。第 4 期(第 17-19 天)允许研究药物清除并开始门诊抗精神病治疗;在此期间还进行了安全性评估。
在每个稳态剂量水平下,在预测药物暴露峰值时,采集三个 ECG 和一个血清或血浆样本。确定了基线时 QTc 间期的点估计值和 95%置信区间(CI),以及每个稳态剂量水平时 QTc 间期从基线的平均变化。齐拉西酮的 QTc 间期从基线的平均变化(毫秒)分别为 4.5(95%CI 1.9-7.1)、19.5(95%CI 15.5-23.4)和 22.5(95%CI 15.7-29.4),稳态剂量分别为 40、160 和 320mg/天;氟哌啶醇分别为-1.2(95%CI-4.1-1.7)、6.6(95%CI 1.6-11.7)和 7.2(95%CI 1.4-13.1),稳态剂量分别为 2.5、15 和 30mg/天。虽然两个治疗组中没有患者的 QTc 间期达到 450 毫秒或更长,但分别有 11 名和 17 名齐拉西酮治疗患者在 160mg/天和 320mg/天,以及 3 名和 5 名氟哌啶醇治疗患者在 15mg/天和 30mg/天,QTc 间期增加了 30 毫秒或更多。大多数治疗出现的不良药物反应的强度为轻度,没有严重的。
齐拉西酮和氟哌啶醇治疗患者的 QTc 间期随剂量增加而增加。高剂量的齐拉西酮或氟哌啶醇治疗并未导致任何患者出现 QTc 间期达到 450 毫秒或更长。