Hersh Adam L, Orrell-Valente Joan K, Maselli Judith H, Olson Lynn M, Cabana Michael D
Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Asthma. 2010 Feb;47(1):21-5. doi: 10.3109/02770900903301286.
Provision of asthma education is associated with decreased hospitalizations and emergency department visits for patients with asthma. Our objective was to describe national trends in the provision of asthma education by primary care physicians in office settings.
We used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative dataset of patient visits to office-based physicians. We identified visits to primary care physicians for patients where asthma was a reason for the visit (asthma-related visits) or who had a diagnosis of asthma, but asthma was not a specific reason for the visit (asthma-unrelated visits) and estimated the percentage of visits where asthma education was provided. Data were available for asthma-related visits from 2001-2006 and from 2005-2006 only for asthma-unrelated visits. We examined time trends in asthma education and used multivariable logistic regression to identify independent patient and system-related factors that were predictors of asthma education.
The percentage of asthma-related visits where asthma education was provided declined during the study period, from 50% in 2001-2002 to 38% in 2005-2006 (p = 0.03). Asthma education was provided less frequently during asthma-unrelated visits compared to asthma-related visits (12% vs. 38%, p<0.0001). Independent predictors of providing asthma education included age < or = 18 years, receipt of a controller medication, incorporation of an allied health professional during the visit, longer visit duration and Northeast region.
Asthma education is underused by primary care physicians and rates have declined from 2001-2006. Interventions designed to promote awareness and greater use of asthma education are needed.
为哮喘患者提供哮喘教育与减少住院次数和急诊就诊次数相关。我们的目的是描述基层医疗医生在门诊环境中提供哮喘教育的全国趋势。
我们使用了国家门诊医疗调查,这是一个具有全国代表性的患者就诊于门诊医生的数据集合。我们确定了因哮喘就诊(与哮喘相关的就诊)或被诊断为哮喘但哮喘不是就诊具体原因(与哮喘不相关的就诊)的患者就诊于基层医疗医生的情况,并估计了提供哮喘教育的就诊百分比。2001 - 2006年有与哮喘相关就诊的数据,2005 - 2006年仅有与哮喘不相关就诊的数据。我们研究了哮喘教育的时间趋势,并使用多变量逻辑回归来确定作为哮喘教育预测因素的独立患者和系统相关因素。
在研究期间,提供哮喘教育的与哮喘相关就诊的百分比下降,从2001 - 2002年的50%降至2005 - 2006年的38%(p = 0.03)。与哮喘相关就诊相比,在与哮喘不相关就诊期间提供哮喘教育的频率较低(12%对38%,p<0.0001)。提供哮喘教育的独立预测因素包括年龄≤18岁、接受控制药物治疗、就诊期间有联合健康专业人员参与、就诊时间较长以及东北地区。
基层医疗医生对哮喘教育的利用不足,且从2001 - 2006年比例有所下降。需要开展干预措施以提高对哮喘教育的认识并增加其使用。