Suppr超能文献

医生对国家哮喘处方指南的遵循情况:来自美国全国门诊调查数据的证据。

Physician adherence to the national asthma prescribing guidelines: evidence from national outpatient survey data in the United States.

作者信息

Navaratnam Prakash, Jayawant Sujata S, Pedersen Craig A, Balkrishnan Rajesh

机构信息

Informagenics LLC, Worthington, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Mar;100(3):216-21. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60445-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Expert Panel 2 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma (EPR-2 guidelines) were developed to improve medication prescribing for patients with persistent asthma and to control acute exacerbations of asthma. In addition, these guidelines also encourage physician-provided asthma education. Little is known about prescribing adherence to EPR-2 guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

To examine physician adherence to EPR-2 asthma medication prescribing guidelines and determine patient and physician factors associated with prescribing of asthma medications.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional retrospective analysis of National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey physician visit survey data from 1998 through 2004. Data were extracted on all patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code for asthma (493.XX) and reason for visit as asthma. The unit of analysis was individual patient visit. The dependent variables in analyses were specific type of drug class. The independent variables were various patient and physician factors. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate study objectives.

RESULTS

Asthma patients in 2002 had 3.3 times more odds of being prescribed controller medications compared with asthma patients in 1998. Findings in 2004 were not significant. Elderly patients had 54% less odds of receiving controller medication compared with those in the 35- to 64-year-old age group. Patients in the other race category are 40% as likely to receive controller asthma medication compared with white patients. Physicians in 2002 had 6.3 times more odds of prescribing long-acting beta-agonists compared with those in 1998. Physicians without ownership stake in their practice had 1.9 times more odds of providing asthma education to their patients compared with those who owned their practice.

CONCLUSION

Physician prescribing of asthma pharmacotherapy does not adequately comply with EPR-2 treatment guidelines.

摘要

背景

制定《哮喘诊断与管理专家小组2指南》(EPR - 2指南)是为了改善持续性哮喘患者的药物处方,并控制哮喘急性加重。此外,这些指南还鼓励医生提供哮喘教育。对于EPR - 2指南的处方依从性了解甚少。

目的

研究医生对EPR - 2哮喘药物处方指南的依从性,并确定与哮喘药物处方相关的患者和医生因素。

方法

本研究是对1998年至2004年国家门诊医疗护理调查医生就诊调查数据进行的横断面回顾性分析。提取了所有患有国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)哮喘编码(493.XX)且就诊原因是哮喘的患者的数据。分析单位是个体患者就诊。分析中的因变量是特定药物类别类型。自变量是各种患者和医生因素。采用逻辑回归分析来评估研究目标。

结果

与1998年的哮喘患者相比,2002年的哮喘患者被开具控制药物的几率高出3.3倍。2004年的结果不显著。与35至64岁年龄组的患者相比,老年患者接受控制药物的几率低54%。与白人患者相比,其他种族类别的患者接受控制哮喘药物的可能性为40%。与1998年的医生相比,2002年的医生开具长效β受体激动剂的几率高出6.3倍。与拥有自己诊所的医生相比,在诊所没有所有权股份的医生为患者提供哮喘教育的几率高出1.9倍。

结论

医生对哮喘药物治疗的处方未充分遵循EPR - 2治疗指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验