McAlister Finlay Aleck, Tu Karen, Majumdar Sumit R, Padwal Rajdeep, Chen Zhongliang, Campbell Norman R C
Open Med. 2007 Jun 12;1(2):e60-7.
Although a purported advantage of newer antihypertensive drug classes is a reduced need for laboratory testing, little is known about the frequency of laboratory monitoring of hypertensive patients in clinical practice and whether this differs across drug classes.
This population-based cohort study used linked administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. All elderly residents of Ontario (age 66 and over) who were newly treated for uncomplicated hypertension between 1994 and 2002 were followed for 24 months or until they were admitted to hospital, died, or were no longer on their initially prescribed monotherapy. We examined the frequency and type of laboratory tests performed while patients were treated with antihypertensive monotherapy.
In a cohort of 164,413 patients, 39% were treated with thiazides and 46% were prescribed "newer" drug classes as initial therapy. At baseline, 96,534 patients (59%) did not have any laboratory testing done, and during 1,701,520 months of monotherapy (mean time on initial agent 10.3 months) only 79,985 (49%) had any tests done. Laboratory testing was significantly less frequent in patients prescribed newer drug classes than thiazides: the adjusted rate ratios for laboratory testing were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-0.95) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, 0.80 (95% CI 0.79-0.81) with calcium-channel blockers, and 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.82) with angiotensin-receptor blockers. However, the absolute increase in testing was small (16 extra electrolyte tests, 6 extra renal function tests, 4 extra glucose tests, and 6 fewer serum cholesterol tests per 100 patients every 6 months), such that the extra laboratory testing observed with thiazides resulted in an additional cost of only C$0.63 per patient every 6 months in comparison with the cost of the newer drug classes.
Laboratory testing in clinical practice was significantly less frequent among patients prescribed newer drug classes than among those prescribed thiazides; however, laboratory monitoring was infrequent in this cohort of elderly patients with hypertension but without comorbidities, and the magnitude of differences between drug classes was small.
尽管据称新型抗高血压药物类别的一个优势是减少了实验室检测的需求,但对于临床实践中高血压患者进行实验室监测的频率以及不同药物类别之间是否存在差异,人们知之甚少。
这项基于人群的队列研究使用了加拿大安大略省的关联行政数据库。对1994年至2002年间新接受单纯性高血压治疗的安大略省所有老年居民(66岁及以上)进行了24个月的随访,或直至他们入院、死亡或不再接受最初开具的单一疗法治疗。我们研究了患者接受抗高血压单一疗法治疗期间进行的实验室检测的频率和类型。
在164,413例患者的队列中,39%接受噻嗪类药物治疗,46%最初接受“新型”药物类别治疗。在基线时,96,534例患者(59%)未进行任何实验室检测,在1,701,520个月的单一疗法治疗期间(初始药物的平均治疗时间为10.3个月),只有79,985例(49%)进行了任何检测。与噻嗪类药物相比,接受新型药物类别治疗的患者进行实验室检测的频率显著更低:使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂时,实验室检测的调整率比为0.94(95%置信区间[CI]0.93 - 0.95),使用钙通道阻滞剂时为0.80(95%CI 0.79 - 0.81),使用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂时为0.79(95%CI 0.76 - 0.82)。然而,检测增加的绝对值很小(每100例患者每6个月额外增加16次电解质检测、6次肾功能检测、4次血糖检测,血清胆固醇检测减少6次),因此与新型药物类别相比,噻嗪类药物额外的实验室检测导致每位患者每6个月仅增加0.63加元的成本。
与接受噻嗪类药物治疗的患者相比,接受新型药物类别治疗的患者在临床实践中进行实验室检测的频率显著更低;然而,在这个无合并症的老年高血压患者队列中,实验室监测并不频繁,且不同药物类别之间的差异幅度较小。