• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
ST segment resolution in patients with tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus tenecteplase alone: Insights from the Combined Angioplasty and Pharmacological Intervention versus Thrombolysis ALone in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPITAL AMI) trial.替奈普酶辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与替奈普酶单独治疗患者的 ST 段回落:来自急性心肌梗死中联合血管成形术与单独药物溶栓治疗(CAPITAL AMI)试验的观察。
Can J Cardiol. 2010 Jan;26(1):e7-12. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(10)70331-7.
2
Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study).急性心肌梗死中血管成形术与药物干预联合治疗对比单纯溶栓治疗(CAPITAL AMI研究)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):417-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.042.
3
Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the prematurely terminated ADdressing the Value of facilitated ANgioplasty after Combination therapy or Eptifibatide monotherapy in acute Myocardial Infarction (ADVANCE MI) trial.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:急性心肌梗死联合治疗或依替巴肽单药治疗后易化血管成形术价值评估(ADVANCE MI)试验提前终止的结果
Am Heart J. 2005 Jul;150(1):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.005.
4
Randomized comparison of pre-hospital-initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction very early after symptom onset: the LIPSIA-STEMI trial (Leipzig immediate prehospital facilitated angioplasty in ST-segment myocardial infarction).症状发作后极早期行院前启动的辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗治疗急性心肌梗死的随机比较:LIPSIA-STEMI 试验(莱比锡即刻院前辅助 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死血管成形术)
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(6):605-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.01.013.
5
Combination reperfusion therapy with eptifibatide and reduced-dose tenecteplase for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of the integrilin and tenecteplase in acute myocardial infarction (INTEGRITI) Phase II Angiographic Trial.依替巴肽与小剂量替奈普酶联合再灌注治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死:急性心肌梗死中依替巴肽与替奈普酶(INTEGRITI)II期血管造影试验结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Apr 16;41(8):1251-60. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00123-2.
6
ST-segment recovery and prognosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction reperfused by prehospital combination fibrinolysis, prehospital initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention, or primary percutaneous coronary intervention.院前联合溶栓、院前启动的易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗再灌注的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的ST段恢复情况及预后
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 1;98(9):1132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.05.044. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
7
ST segment resolution in ASSENT 3: insights into the role of three different treatment strategies for acute myocardial infarction.ASSENT 3研究中ST段回落情况:对急性心肌梗死三种不同治疗策略作用的见解
Eur Heart J. 2003 Aug;24(16):1515-22. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00322-1.
8
Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial.替奈普酶辅助与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者(ASSENT-4 PCI):随机试验
Lancet. 2006 Feb 18;367(9510):569-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68147-6.
9
Multicenter randomized trial of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention with low-dose tenecteplase in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the Athens PCI trial.急性心肌梗死患者应用低剂量替奈普酶辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多中心随机试验:雅典PCI试验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Sep 1;74(3):398-405. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22009.
10
STREAM-2: Half-Dose Tenecteplase or Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Older Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized, Open-Label Trial.STREAM-2 研究:老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者应用替奈普酶半量溶栓或直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项随机、开放标签试验。
Circulation. 2023 Aug 29;148(9):753-764. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064521. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Routine invasive management after fibrinolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.溶栓后常规介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者:一项随机临床试验的系统评价。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011 Jun 20;11:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-11-34.

本文引用的文献

1
Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的易化PCI
N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2205-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706816.
2
Use of the TIMI frame count in the assessment of coronary artery blood flow and microvascular function over the past 15 years.过去15年中TIMI帧数在冠状动脉血流和微血管功能评估中的应用。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009 Apr;27(3):316-28. doi: 10.1007/s11239-008-0220-3. Epub 2008 Apr 20.
3
Adverse outcomes in fibrinolytic-based facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the ASSENT-4 PCI electrocardiographic substudy.基于纤溶的易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的不良结局:ASSENT-4 PCI心电图亚研究的见解
Eur Heart J. 2008 Apr;29(7):871-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn078. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
4
Relation of corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count and ST-segment resolution to myocardial tissue perfusion after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后校正的心肌梗死溶栓帧数与ST段回落和心肌组织灌注的关系。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 15;71(3):312-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21376.
5
Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI): an open, prospective, randomised, multicentre trial.急性心肌梗死联合阿昔单抗瑞替普酶支架置入研究(CARESS-in-AMI)中直接血管成形术与溶栓后补救性血管成形术标准治疗的对比:一项开放、前瞻性、随机、多中心试验。
Lancet. 2008 Feb 16;371(9612):559-68. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60268-8.
6
Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的血栓抽吸术。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 7;358(6):557-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706416.
7
Percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis: a multiple meta-analyses approach according to the type of strategy.溶栓后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:基于策略类型的多项荟萃分析方法
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct 3;48(7):1326-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.064. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
8
A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study.ST段抬高型心肌梗死后早期药物治疗联合/不联合及时冠状动脉介入治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:WEST(哪种早期ST段抬高型心肌梗死治疗方法)研究
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jul;27(13):1530-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl088. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
9
Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials.ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:随机试验的定量综述
Lancet. 2006 Feb 18;367(9510):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68148-8.
10
Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial.替奈普酶辅助与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者(ASSENT-4 PCI):随机试验
Lancet. 2006 Feb 18;367(9510):569-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68147-6.

替奈普酶辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与替奈普酶单独治疗患者的 ST 段回落:来自急性心肌梗死中联合血管成形术与单独药物溶栓治疗(CAPITAL AMI)试验的观察。

ST segment resolution in patients with tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus tenecteplase alone: Insights from the Combined Angioplasty and Pharmacological Intervention versus Thrombolysis ALone in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPITAL AMI) trial.

机构信息

University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2010 Jan;26(1):e7-12. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(10)70331-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0828-282x(10)70331-7
PMID:20101370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2827226/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compared with fibrinolysis alone, fibrinolysis followed by immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduced clinical events in the Combined Angioplasty and Pharmacological Intervention versus Thrombolysis ALone in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPITAL AMI) study. It is unclear whether the benefits go beyond achieving epicardial reperfusion.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the differences in ST segment resolution (STR) among patients treated with tenecteplase (TNK)-facilitated PCI compared with patients treated with TNK alone.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A formal ST segment analysis was conducted on the 170 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction in the CAPITAL AMI trial: 86 patients treated with TNK-facilitated PCI were compared with 84 patients who were treated with TNK alone. Epicardial flow measured by percentage with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow improved from 52% (pre-PCI) to 89% (post-PCI) in those assigned to facilitated PCI. ST segment resolution was stratified by complete (70% or greater), partial (less than 70% to 30%) or no (less than 30% to 0%) resolution. The baseline mean ST segment elevation was 11.3+/-7.5 mm in the facilitated PCI patients and 11.8+/-7.1 mm in patients with TNK alone (P=0.66). Complete STR in the facilitated PCI patients versus the TNK-alone patients was present in 55.6% versus 54.6%, respectively (P=0.58) at 180 min and 62.0% versus 55.3% (P=0.64), respectively at day 1. The mean STR at 180 min and day 1 were similar in patients who experienced death, reinfarction, recurrent unstable ischemia or stroke at six months compared with patients who remained event free: 56.3% versus 64.6% at 180 min (P=0.40); and 67.7% versus 67.6% at day 1 (P=0.99), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TNK-facilitated PCI did not demonstrate differences in ST segment resolution compared with TNK alone, despite improvement in epicardial flow after PCI. Further studies are required to clarify these findings.

摘要

背景

与单独溶栓相比,纤溶联合即刻经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)可降低急性心肌梗死的联合血管成形术和药物干预与单独溶栓治疗(CAPITAL AMI)研究中的临床事件发生率。尚不清楚这些益处是否超越了心外膜再灌注的实现。

目的

确定与单独使用替奈普酶(TNK)相比,接受 TNK 辅助 PCI 治疗的患者与接受 TNK 单独治疗的患者之间 ST 段缓解(STR)的差异。

方法和结果

对 CAPITAL AMI 试验中 170 例 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行了正式的 ST 段分析:86 例接受 TNK 辅助 PCI 治疗的患者与 84 例接受 TNK 单独治疗的患者进行了比较。通过心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)血流 3 级的百分比测量,接受辅助 PCI 治疗的患者的心外膜血流从 PCI 前的 52%(术前)改善至 89%(术后)。STR 按完全缓解(70%或更高)、部分缓解(低于 70%至 30%)或无缓解(低于 30%至 0%)进行分层。在接受辅助 PCI 治疗的患者中,基线平均 ST 段抬高为 11.3+/-7.5mm,而单独接受 TNK 治疗的患者为 11.8+/-7.1mm(P=0.66)。接受辅助 PCI 治疗的患者与单独接受 TNK 治疗的患者相比,在 180 分钟时完全 STR 分别为 55.6%和 54.6%(P=0.58),在第 1 天分别为 62.0%和 55.3%(P=0.64)。与无事件发生的患者相比,在 6 个月时发生死亡、再梗死、复发性不稳定缺血或卒中等事件的患者在 180 分钟和第 1 天的平均 STR 相似:180 分钟时分别为 56.3%和 64.6%(P=0.40);第 1 天分别为 67.7%和 67.6%(P=0.99)。

结论

尽管 PCI 后心外膜血流得到改善,但与单独使用 TNK 相比,TNK 辅助 PCI 并未显示出 ST 段缓解方面的差异。需要进一步的研究来阐明这些发现。