Suppr超能文献

溶栓后常规介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者:一项随机临床试验的系统评价。

Routine invasive management after fibrinolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

机构信息

Institut universitaire de cardiologie et pneumologie de Québec, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011 Jun 20;11:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-11-34.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolysis are increasingly, and ever earlier, referred for routine coronary angiography and where feasible, undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to examine the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on which this approach is based.

METHODS

We systematically searched EMBASE, Medline, and references of relevant studies. All contemporary RCTs (published since 1995) that compared systematic invasive management of STEMI patients after fibrinolysis with standard care were included. Relevant study design and clinical outcome data were extracted.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs that randomized a total of 3320 patients were identified. All suggested a benefit from routine early invasive management. They were individually reviewed but important design variations precluded a formal quantitative meta-analysis. Importantly, several trials did not compare a routine practice of invasive management after fibrinolysis with a more selective 'ischemia-guided' approach but rather compared an early versus later routine invasive strategy. In the other studies, recourse to subsequent invasive management in the usual care group varied widely. Comparison of the effectiveness of a routine invasive approach to usual care was also limited by asymmetric use of a second anti-platelet agent, differing enzyme definitions of reinfarction occurring spontaneously versus as a complication of PCI, a preponderance of the 'soft' outcome of recurrent ischemia in the combined primary endpoint, and an interpretative bias when invasive procedures on follow-up were tallied as an endpoint without considering initial invasive procedures performed in the routine invasive arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to important methodological limitations, definitive RCT evidence in favor of routine invasive management following fibrinolysis in patients with STEMI is presently lacking.

摘要

背景

接受溶栓治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者越来越多地(甚至更早地)接受常规冠状动脉造影检查,并在可行的情况下进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。我们试图研究基于这种方法的随机临床试验(RCT)。

方法

我们系统地检索了 EMBASE、Medline 和相关研究的参考文献。纳入所有 1995 年后发表的比较溶栓后 STEMI 患者系统侵入性管理与标准治疗的当代 RCT。提取相关研究设计和临床结局数据。

结果

共确定了 9 项随机分配了 3320 名患者的 RCT。所有研究均表明常规早期侵入性管理有益。我们单独进行了审查,但重要的设计差异使我们无法进行正式的定量荟萃分析。重要的是,一些试验并未比较溶栓后常规侵入性管理的常规实践与更具选择性的“缺血指导”方法,而是比较了早期与晚期常规侵入性策略。在其他研究中,常规治疗组随后进行侵入性治疗的比例差异很大。由于第二次抗血小板药物的使用不对称、与 PCI 相关的再梗死与自发性再梗死的酶学定义不同、主要终点中复合终点“复发性缺血”的“软性”结局居多,以及在不考虑常规治疗组初始侵入性治疗的情况下将随访期间的侵入性治疗计为终点时存在解释性偏倚,常规侵入性方法对常规治疗效果的比较也受到限制。

结论

由于存在重要的方法学局限性,目前缺乏支持 STEMI 患者溶栓后常规侵入性管理的确定性 RCT 证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fa/3145591/b1105f864683/1471-2261-11-34-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验