Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;35(2):233-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.7470.
To compare power Doppler flow mapping characteristics of endometrial polyps and submucosal fibroids and analyze whether two different power Doppler characteristics, single-vessel pattern and rim-like vessel pattern, can help to differentiate these focal endometrial lesions.
Patients suspected of having endometrial polyps or submucosal fibroids on sonohysterography were examined prospectively by transvaginal B-mode and power Doppler sonography. Single-vessel pattern and rim-like vessel pattern were considered to be characteristic of endometrial polyps and submucosal fibroids, respectively. Suspected diagnoses of the lesions according to vascular Doppler characteristics were compared with the final diagnosis following histopathological examination.
Included in the final analysis were 49 patients with histological confirmation of the type of endometrial lesion: 32 with endometrial polyps and 17 with submucosal fibroids. Power Doppler signals were observed in 47 of these; they were not observed in two patients with endometrial polyps. Of the 32 with endometrial polyps, 26 (81.3%) endometrial polyps showed a single-vessel pattern, three (9.4%) showed a multiple-vessel pattern and one (3.1%) showed a scattered-vessel pattern. Of the 17 with submucosal fibroids, 12 (70.6%) showed a rim-like vessel pattern, three (17.6%) showed a multiple-vessel pattern and two (11.8%) showed a single-vessel pattern. Single-vessel pattern was associated with two false-positive cases, but there were no false-positive cases for rim-like vessel pattern. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for single-vessel pattern in diagnosing endometrial polyps were 81.2%, 88.2%, 92.9% and 71.4% and for rim-like pattern in diagnosing submucosal fibroids they were 70.6%, 100%, 100% and 86.5%, respectively.
Power Doppler blood flow mapping is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of focal endometrial pathology and is useful in distinguishing submucosal fibroids and endometrial polyps.
比较子宫内膜息肉和黏膜下肌瘤的能量多普勒血流成像特征,分析单一血管模式和边缘状血管模式这两种不同的能量多普勒特征是否有助于区分这些局灶性子宫内膜病变。
对经阴道超声检查怀疑有子宫内膜息肉或黏膜下肌瘤的患者进行前瞻性经阴道二维超声和能量多普勒超声检查。单一血管模式和边缘状血管模式分别被认为是子宫内膜息肉和黏膜下肌瘤的特征性表现。根据血管多普勒特征对病变的可疑诊断与组织病理学检查的最终诊断进行比较。
最终纳入 49 例经组织学证实的子宫内膜病变患者进行分析:32 例为子宫内膜息肉,17 例为黏膜下肌瘤。其中 47 例可见能量多普勒信号,2 例子宫内膜息肉患者未见能量多普勒信号。32 例子宫内膜息肉中,26 例(81.3%)表现为单一血管模式,3 例(9.4%)表现为多血管模式,1 例(3.1%)表现为散在血管模式。17 例黏膜下肌瘤中,12 例(70.6%)表现为边缘状血管模式,3 例(17.6%)表现为多血管模式,2 例(11.8%)表现为单一血管模式。单一血管模式与 2 例假阳性病例相关,但边缘状血管模式无一例假阳性。单一血管模式诊断子宫内膜息肉的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 81.2%、88.2%、92.9%和 71.4%,边缘状模式诊断黏膜下肌瘤的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 70.6%、100%、100%和 86.5%。
能量多普勒血流成像在局灶性子宫内膜病变的诊断中具有重要价值,有助于区分黏膜下肌瘤和子宫内膜息肉。