Hepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Graduate Institute of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan.
J Infect Dis. 2010 Mar;201(5):751-9. doi: 10.1086/650470.
The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (PegIFN)/ribavirin treatment in elderly patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
Seventy elderly patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (group A; age, > or = 65 years) and 140 sex- and HCV genotype-matched controls (group B; age, 50-64 years) were allocated to receive a PegIFN-alpha-2a/ribavirin standard-of-care regimen.
Group A had a significantly higher rate of treatment discontinuation (21.4% vs 6.4%; P = .001) and grade 3 or 4 adverse events (34.3% vs 20%; P = .002) than group B. In intention-to-treat analysis, the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was substantially lower in group A than in group B (67.1% vs 78.6%; P = .07). The inferiority of the SVR rate in group A was observed among patients with HCV genotype 1 (HCV-1) (51.9% vs 75.9%; P = .03) but not among patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 (HCV-2/3) (76.7% vs 80.2%; P = .65). Among patients in group A who had a rapid virologic response, those infected with HCV-1 and those infected with HCV-2/3 had similar SVR rates (80% and 87.9%, respectively). For patients receiving treatment for >80% of its expected duration, SVR rates were similar between the 2 groups (80.4% vs 82.6%, respectively), regardless of viral genotype.
Older patients with HCV infection, especially those in the subgroup infected with HCV-1, had a greater frequency of adverse events and poorer adherence to the standard-of-care regimen, which may be the major reason for treatment inferiority.
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00629824 .
本研究评估了聚乙二醇干扰素(PegIFN)/利巴韦林治疗老年丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者的疗效和安全性。
70 例老年丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者(A 组;年龄≥65 岁)和 140 例性别和 HCV 基因型匹配的对照者(B 组;年龄 50-64 岁)接受 PegIFN-α-2a/利巴韦林标准治疗方案。
A 组治疗中断率(21.4% vs. 6.4%;P=0.001)和 3 级或 4 级不良事件发生率(34.3% vs. 20%;P=0.002)显著高于 B 组。意向治疗分析显示,A 组持续病毒学应答(SVR)率显著低于 B 组(67.1% vs. 78.6%;P=0.07)。在 HCV-1 感染患者中观察到 A 组的 SVR 率较差(51.9% vs. 75.9%;P=0.03),但在 HCV-2/3 感染患者中则无差异(76.7% vs. 80.2%;P=0.65)。在 A 组快速病毒学应答患者中,HCV-1 感染和 HCV-2/3 感染患者的 SVR 率相似(分别为 80%和 87.9%)。对于接受治疗超过预计治疗时间 80%的患者,两组的 SVR 率相似(分别为 80.4%和 82.6%),与病毒基因型无关。
老年 HCV 感染患者,尤其是 HCV-1 亚组感染患者,不良反应发生率更高,对标准治疗方案的依从性较差,这可能是治疗效果较差的主要原因。
Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符 NCT00629824。