• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

15 年的永久性起搏器和除颤器导联及补丁取出经验。

A 15-year experience with permanent pacemaker and defibrillator lead and patch extractions.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jan;89(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.10.025.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.10.025
PMID:20103204
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The value of extraction of infected or hazardous epicardial and endocardial pacemaker and internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads is well established. Recent reviews including all leads and patches are lacking. This review describes experience with open and percutaneous techniques, including all lead types and indications.

METHODS

With Institutional Review Board approval, we reviewed charts of all adults and children undergoing extraction of permanent pacemaker and ICD leads and patches by a single operator between 1993 and 2008.

RESULTS

Overall, 145 leads and 7 patches were removed from 79 patients. Dwell time averaged 56.2 months. The commonest indications for extraction were infection (73.4%) or risk of lead fracture (20.3%). Most leads (84.2%) were extracted percutaneously. Removal was complete for 131 leads (86.2%) and partial in 14. Incomplete lead removal was rarely associated with clinical complications. Minor complications occurred in 6 patients (7.6%) and major complications occurred in 3 (3.8%). The major complication rate was 16.7% for the open group and 1.5% in the percutaneous group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pacemaker and ICD infections generally respond to antibiotics, complete hardware removal, and a hardware free interval. However, these principles cannot always be invoked, and the risk of complications is likely to increase when hardware cannot be completely removed or when a hardware-free interval is unsafe or inadvisable. Percutaneous lead extraction is superior to open extraction in terms of safety and comfort, but epicardial extraction techniques remain critically important in selected patients.

摘要

背景

从感染或有危险的心外膜和心内膜起搏器和植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)导线中提取的价值已得到充分证实。最近的综述包括所有的导线和补丁都缺乏。这篇综述描述了开放和经皮技术的经验,包括所有类型的导线和适应证。

方法

经机构审查委员会批准,我们回顾了 1993 年至 2008 年间,一位医生为 79 例成人和儿童进行的所有永久性起搏器和 ICD 导线和补丁的提取手术记录。

结果

总体而言,从 79 例患者中取出了 145 根导线和 7 个补丁。留置时间平均为 56.2 个月。最常见的提取适应证是感染(73.4%)或导线断裂风险(20.3%)。大多数导线(84.2%)经皮取出。131 根导线(86.2%)完全取出,14 根部分取出。不完全导线取出很少与临床并发症有关。6 例患者(7.6%)发生轻微并发症,3 例患者(3.8%)发生严重并发症。开放组的严重并发症发生率为 16.7%,经皮组为 1.5%。

结论

起搏器和 ICD 感染一般对抗生素、完全硬件去除和无硬件间隔期有反应。然而,这些原则并非总是可行的,当无法完全去除硬件或无硬件间隔期不安全或不建议时,并发症的风险可能会增加。经皮导线提取在安全性和舒适度方面优于开放性提取,但在某些患者中,心外膜提取技术仍然至关重要。

相似文献

1
A 15-year experience with permanent pacemaker and defibrillator lead and patch extractions.15 年的永久性起搏器和除颤器导联及补丁取出经验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jan;89(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.10.025.
2
Percutaneous pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction in 100 patients with intracardiac vegetations defined by transesophageal echocardiogram.经食管超声心动图定义的 100 例心内膜赘生物患者的经皮起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器导线拔除术。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 2;55(9):886-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.034.
3
Is the transvenous extraction of cardioverter-defibrillator leads more hazardous than that of pacemaker leads?经静脉取出心脏转复除颤器导线是否比取出起搏器导线更危险?
Kardiol Pol. 2010 Aug;68(8):884-90.
4
Pacemaker and internal cardioverter defibrillator lead extraction: a safe and effective surgical approach.心脏起搏器和植入式心律转复除颤器导线拔除术:一种安全有效的手术方法。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Nov;90(5):1411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.036.
5
Percutaneous extraction of endocardial leads--a single centre experience in 120 patients.经皮心内膜导线拔除术——120例患者的单中心经验
Kardiol Pol. 2009 Feb;67(2):149-56; discussion 157-8.
6
Lead extraction for device related infections: a single-centre experience.与装置相关感染的导线取出术:单中心经验
Europace. 2004 May;6(3):243-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.01.007.
7
Management and outcome of permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infections.永久性起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器感染的管理与预后
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 8;49(18):1851-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.072. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
8
Effectiveness of excimer laser-assisted pacing and ICD lead extraction in children and young adults.准分子激光辅助起搏及植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)导线拔除在儿童及青年中的有效性
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 May;29(5):461-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00376.x.
9
Laser-assisted extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads: the role of the cardiac surgeon.激光辅助拔除起搏器和除颤器导线:心脏外科医生的作用。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 May;87(5):1446-50; discussion 1450-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.015.
10
Explantation of implantable defibrillator leads using open heart surgery or percutaneous techniques.使用心脏直视手术或经皮技术取出植入式除颤器导线。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jan;85(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.048.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention and Risk Assessment of Cardiac Device Infections in Clinical Practice.临床实践中心脏设备感染的预防与风险评估
J Clin Med. 2024 May 4;13(9):2707. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092707.
2
Incomplete Lead Removal During the Extraction Procedure: Predisposing Factors and Impact on Long-Term Survival in Infectious and Non-Infectious Cases: Analysis of 3741 Procedures.拔牙过程中铅去除不完全:感染性和非感染性病例的易感因素及对长期生存的影响:3741例手术分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 13;12(8):2837. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082837.
3
New Insights in Central Venous Disorders. The Role of Transvenous Lead Extractions.
中心静脉疾病的新见解。经静脉导线拔除的作用。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 23;9:783576. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.783576. eCollection 2022.
4
Salvage of Infected Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices with Subpectoral Plane Pocket Revision.经胸肌下平面囊袋修复术挽救感染的心脏植入式电子装置
Indian J Plast Surg. 2021 Oct 8;54(3):344-349. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735417. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Therapy and outcomes of cardiac implantable electronic devices infections.心脏植入式电子设备感染的治疗和结果。
Europace. 2021 Jun 23;23(23 Suppl 4):iv20-iv27. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab016.
6
Minimally Invasive Techniques to Avoid Sternotomy in Complex Lead Extraction Cases.复杂导线拔除病例中避免开胸的微创技术。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019 Feb 15;10(2):3515-3521. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2019.100201. eCollection 2019 Feb.
7
Computed Tomography-Guided Risk Assessment in Percutaneous Lead Extraction.计算机断层扫描引导的经皮导线拔除风险评估。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Dec;5(12):1439-1446. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
8
European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).欧洲心脏病学会(EHRA)关于如何预防、诊断和治疗心脏植入式电子设备感染的国际共识文件——得到了心律学会(HRS)、亚太心律学会(APHRS)、拉丁美洲心律学会(LAHRS)、心血管感染性疾病国际学会(ISCVID)和欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会(ESCMID)的认可,该共识文件是与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的。
Europace. 2020 Apr 1;22(4):515-549. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz246.
9
Transvenous Lead Extractions: Current Approaches and Future Trends.经静脉导线拔除:当前方法与未来趋势。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018 Aug;7(3):210-217. doi: 10.15420/aer.2018.33.2.
10
Leadless pacemaker implantation after transcatheter lead extraction in complex anatomy patient.复杂解剖结构患者经导管导线拔除后无导线起搏器植入术。
Clin Case Rep. 2018 Apr 19;6(6):1106-1108. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1532. eCollection 2018 Jun.