Suppr超能文献

心脏手术后的心包积液:危险因素、患者特征和当代管理。

Pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery: risk factors, patient profiles, and contemporary management.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jan;89(1):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.026.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to review recent experience at our institution in the diagnosis and treatment of pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery and to identify risk factors for its development.

METHODS

We searched our clinical database for patients 18 years or older who had cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass from 1993 through 2005. For patients with pericardial effusion (study group), medical records were reviewed to evaluate its manifestations and management. To identify risk factors for effusion, study patients were compared with patients without effusions. A second analysis compared the study group with a cohort without effusions who had routine postoperative echocardiographic examination.

RESULTS

Of 21,416 patients identified, 327 (1.5%) had pericardial effusion (study group), 280 (86%) of whom had nonspecific symptoms. Clinical features of tamponade were documented in 138 patients (42%). Effusions were evacuated by echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis (n = 169, 52%) or surgical drainage (n = 75, 23%). Effusion resolved after left thoracocentesis for pleural effusion in 3 patients (1%); 67 patients (20%) were treated conservatively. In 13 cases (4%), recurrent effusion required drainage after initial pericardiocentesis. Independent risk factors for effusion were larger body surface area, pulmonary thromboembolism, hypertension, immunosuppression, renal failure, urgency of operation, cardiac operation other than coronary artery bypass grafting, and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass. Previous cardiac operations were associated with lower risk of effusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, pericardial effusion occurred in 1.5% of patients, and symptoms were nonspecific. Several factors, mainly related to preoperative characteristics and type of operation, predispose patients to effusion. Echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis is effective and safe in these patients.

摘要

背景

我们旨在回顾本机构在心脏手术后心包积液诊断和治疗方面的近期经验,并确定其发生的危险因素。

方法

我们在临床数据库中搜索了 1993 年至 2005 年期间接受体外循环心脏手术的年龄在 18 岁或以上的患者。对于有心包积液的患者(研究组),查阅病历以评估其表现和处理方法。为了确定积液的危险因素,将研究组患者与无积液患者进行比较。第二次分析将研究组与接受常规术后超声心动图检查的无积液队列进行了比较。

结果

在确定的 21416 例患者中,有 327 例(1.5%)有心包积液(研究组),其中 280 例(86%)有非特异性症状。有 138 例患者(42%)记录到填塞的临床特征。通过超声心动图引导下心包穿刺引流(n = 169,52%)或手术引流(n = 75,23%)排空积液。3 例(1%)因胸腔积液行左侧胸腔穿刺后积液消退;67 例(20%)患者接受保守治疗。在 13 例(4%)中,初次心包穿刺引流后积液复发需要引流。积液的独立危险因素包括更大的体表面积、肺血栓栓塞、高血压、免疫抑制、肾衰竭、手术紧迫性、除冠状动脉旁路移植术以外的心脏手术以及体外循环时间延长。既往心脏手术与积液发生风险降低相关。

结论

在我们的研究中,心包积液在 1.5%的患者中发生,且症状无特异性。有几个因素,主要与术前特征和手术类型有关,使患者易发生积液。超声心动图引导下心包穿刺引流在这些患者中是有效且安全的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验