Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Feb;93(2):822-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-2007.
The objectives of this cross-sectional observational study were to 1) describe the feeding management and characteristics of rations for high-producing Holstein cows housed in freestall barns in Minnesota, 2) evaluate ration change over time, and 3) investigate herd-level risk factors for ration change. Each of 50 randomly selected freestall dairy herds was visited once during the study. Samples of TMR were collected from the high-production group feed bunk to represent the initial ration as delivered to the cows, 3 additional samples were collected every 2 to 3h after feed delivery, and the accumulated orts were cleaned out of the feed bunk. Feeding management practices and TMR formulation were also collected at the time of visit. Seventy percent of herds fed once daily, 22% fed twice daily, and 8% fed 3 times daily. Frequency of feed push-up was 5.4+/-2.3 times daily. Linear feed bunk space per cow was 0.45+/-0.11m. Sixty-two percent of the farms had 3-row pens and 38% had 2-row pens. Linear feed bunk space per cow was greater in 2-row pens (0.56 m/cow) than in 3-row pens (0.39 m/cow). Post and rail was the most common type of feed barrier; it was used by 60% of the herds. Headlocks were used by 28% of the herds, combination of post and rail with headlocks was used by 8%, and diagonal bars were used by 4%. Water trough linear space was 4.6+/-2.1 cm/cow. Estimated dry matter intake was 24.3 kg/cow per day. The forage content of the formulated ration was 52% of the ration DM, and corn silage was the most commonly used forage. The NDF content of the analyzed ration was greater than the NDF content of the formulated ration (30.6 and 29.8%, respectively). In contrast, the CP content was lower (17.5 and 17.9%, respectively). Some feeding management practices (e.g., feeding frequency) were associated with ration NDF content change over time. This association may be minimized by implementing ration and management changes.
1)描述明尼苏达州厩舍内高产荷斯坦奶牛的饲养管理和饲粮特点;2)评估饲粮随时间的变化;3)调查与饲粮变化相关的畜群水平风险因素。在研究期间,每个随机选择的 50 个自由式畜群中,每个畜群仅访问一次。从高生产组饲料槽中采集 TMR 样本,以代表最初的饲粮,在饲料交付后每 2-3 小时采集 3 个额外样本,并从饲料槽中清除累积的剩料。在访问时还收集了饲养管理措施和 TMR 配方。70%的畜群每天喂 1 次,22%的畜群每天喂 2 次,8%的畜群每天喂 3 次。饲料推料的频率为每天 5.4+/-2.3 次。每头牛的线性饲料槽空间为 0.45+/-0.11m。62%的农场有 3 排畜栏,38%的农场有 2 排畜栏。2 排畜栏的每头牛线性饲料槽空间大于 3 排畜栏(0.56 m/头对 0.39 m/头)。柱轨是最常见的饲料栏类型;60%的畜群使用柱轨。头锁用于 28%的畜群,柱轨和头锁组合用于 8%的畜群,对角杆用于 4%的畜群。食槽线性空间为 4.6+/-2.1cm/头。估计干物质采食量为 24.3kg/头/天。配方饲粮的粗饲料含量占饲粮 DM 的 52%,青贮玉米是最常用的饲料。分析饲粮的 NDF 含量高于配方饲粮的 NDF 含量(分别为 30.6%和 29.8%)。相反,CP 含量较低(分别为 17.5%和 17.9%)。一些饲养管理措施(例如,喂养频率)与饲粮 NDF 含量随时间的变化有关。通过实施饲粮和管理的变化,可以将这种关联降到最低。