• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根管桩表面处理、牙本质处理和人工老化对玻璃纤维增强复合树脂桩固位力的影响。

Effects of endodontic post surface treatment, dentin conditioning, and artificial aging on the retention of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts.

机构信息

Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jan;103(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60212-2.

DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60212-2
PMID:20105680
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Several post surface treatments with or without the application of a bonding agent have been recommended to improve the bond strength of resin cements to posts. A regimen that produces the maximum bond strength of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts has not been verified.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of post surface conditioning methods and artificial aging on the retention and microleakage of adhesively luted glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-two endodontically treated single-rooted teeth were prepared for glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. The posts were submitted to 3 different surface treatments (n=24), including no treatment, etching with phosphoric acid, and airborne-particle abrasion. Subgroups of the posts (n=8) were then allocated for 3 different experimental conditions: no artificial aging, no bonding agent; no artificial aging, bonding agent; or artificial aging, bonding agent. The posts were luted with resin cement (Calibra). Post retention was measured in tension at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. The posts assigned for microleakage investigation were placed in fuchsin dye for 72 hours. The dislodged posts and the post spaces were examined microscopically to evaluate the mode of failure and explore the microleakage. Data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test (alpha=.05).

RESULTS

The mean (SD) retention values for test groups ranged from 269 (63.8) to 349 (52.2) N. The retention values of the airborne-particle-abrasion group were significantly higher than those of the acidic-treatment and no-treatment groups. The application of bonding agent on the post surface produced no significant influence on retention. The mean retention values after artificial aging were significantly higher than without artificial aging. Microscopic evaluation demonstrated that the failure mode was primarily mixed.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating the surface of the posts with phosphoric acid for 15 seconds before cementation produced no significant improvement in post retention. Airborne-particle abrasion of the surface of the post significantly improved post retention.

摘要

问题陈述

已经推荐了几种表面后处理方法,包括使用或不使用粘结剂,以提高树脂水门汀对桩的粘结强度。尚未验证产生玻璃纤维增强复合树脂桩最大粘结强度的方案。

目的

本研究的目的是评估桩表面处理方法和人工老化对玻璃纤维增强复合树脂桩粘结固位力和微渗漏的影响。

材料和方法

将 72 颗牙髓治疗的单根牙制备用于玻璃纤维增强复合树脂桩。将这些桩进行 3 种不同的表面处理(n=24),包括不处理、磷酸蚀刻和喷丸处理。然后将桩的亚组(n=8)分配到 3 种不同的实验条件下:无人工老化,无粘结剂;无人工老化,粘结剂;或人工老化,粘结剂。用树脂水门汀(Calibra)粘结桩。在 2mm/min 的十字头速度下测量桩的固位力。将用于微渗漏研究的桩放置在品红染料中 72 小时。检查脱位的桩和桩腔,通过显微镜观察评估失效模式并探索微渗漏。数据采用双因素方差分析,然后采用 Tukey HSD 检验(α=.05)。

结果

测试组的平均(SD)固位力值范围为 269(63.8)至 349(52.2)N。喷丸处理组的固位力值明显高于酸处理组和不处理组。在桩表面应用粘结剂对固位力没有显著影响。人工老化后的平均固位力值明显高于未人工老化的。显微镜评估表明,失效模式主要为混合模式。

结论

在粘结前用磷酸处理桩表面 15 秒不能显著提高桩的固位力。喷丸处理桩表面可显著提高桩的固位力。

相似文献

1
Effects of endodontic post surface treatment, dentin conditioning, and artificial aging on the retention of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts.根管桩表面处理、牙本质处理和人工老化对玻璃纤维增强复合树脂桩固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jan;103(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60212-2.
2
Effect of dentin conditioning on retention of airborne-particle-abraded, adhesively luted glass fiber-reinforced resin posts.牙本质预处理对空气颗粒磨损、粘结固定的玻璃纤维增强树脂桩固位力的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Nov;100(5):367-73. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60238-3.
3
Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.表面处理对玻璃纤维根管桩固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Mar;95(3):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.01.006.
4
Effect of acid conditioning of root canal dentin on the retention of adhesively luted glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts.根管牙本质酸处理对粘结固定玻璃纤维增强复合材料(FRC)桩固位力的影响。
Am J Dent. 2009 Dec;22(6):376-80.
5
Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.空气颗粒磨损对碳/环氧树脂和玻璃/双酚A甲基丙烯酸缩水甘油酯纤维增强树脂桩的力学性能和粘结强度的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Jun;99(6):444-54. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60106-7.
6
Effects of chemical surface treatments of quartz and glass fiber posts on the retention of a composite resin.石英和玻璃纤维桩的化学表面处理对复合树脂固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Jan;99(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60007-4.
7
Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems.牙根牙本质与三种玻璃纤维桩系统之间的粘结强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jul;96(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.005.
8
Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with 3 different adhesive systems and 4 different fiber-reinforced posts.不同黏结系统和 4 种不同纤维增强型桩核修复后牙体牙髓病治疗后微渗漏的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Apr;107(4):239-51. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60069-9.
9
Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.不同表面处理对氧化锆桩与复合树脂核材料之间短期粘结强度和耐久性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 May;99(5):388-99. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60088-8.
10
Fatigue resistance of bovine teeth restored with resin-bonded fiber posts: effect of post surface conditioning.
Gen Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;56(1):56-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Er: YAG laser and different surface treatment methods on the push-out bond strength of glass fiber post to self adhesive resin cement.铒钇铝石榴石激光及不同表面处理方法对玻璃纤维桩与自粘树脂水门汀推出粘结强度的影响。
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 8;40(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04317-x.
2
Current Insights on Fiber Posts: A Narrative Review of Laboratory and Clinical Studies.纤维桩的当前见解:实验室与临床研究的叙述性综述
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;11(10):236. doi: 10.3390/dj11100236.
3
Evaluation of a half-digital technique for fabricating customized post-cores: A pilot study.
用于制作定制桩核的半数字化技术评估:一项初步研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 7;9(4):e15363. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15363. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Effect of Surface Treatments of Polyetherketoneketone as a Post Material on Shear Bond Strength to Root Dentin using Two Types of Resin Cement.聚醚醚酮酮后材料表面处理对两种树脂水门汀与牙本质剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2022 Nov 28;24:435-443. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b3608791.
5
Comparison of tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of different materials to root canal dentin after chewing simulation.不同材料制成的球附着体与咀嚼模拟后根管牙本质的拉伸粘结强度比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jun 24;22(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02282-3.
6
Surface modification of glass fiber-reinforced composite posts to enhance their bond strength to resin-matrix cements: an integrative review.玻璃纤维增强复合桩的表面改性以提高其与树脂基质水门汀的粘结强度:一项系统评价
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):95-107. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04221-y. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
7
Effect of Glass Fiber Post Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An "In Vitro" Study.玻璃纤维桩表面处理对自粘树脂水门汀粘结强度的影响:一项“体外”研究。
Int J Dent. 2021 Aug 24;2021:8856657. doi: 10.1155/2021/8856657. eCollection 2021.
8
Effects of Surface Treatments of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Post on Bond Strength to Root Dentine: A Systematic Review.玻璃纤维增强桩表面处理对其与牙根牙本质粘结强度的影响:一项系统评价
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 23;13(8):1967. doi: 10.3390/ma13081967.
9
Fracture resistance and marginal gap formation of post-core restorations: influence of different fiber-reinforced composites.桩核修复的抗折裂性能和边缘间隙形成:不同纤维增强复合材料的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jan;24(1):265-276. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02902-3. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
[Study of bond strength of one-piece glass fiber posts-and-cores with flared root canals in vitro].[体外研究一体式玻璃纤维桩核与喇叭形根管的粘结强度]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Apr 18;51(2):327-334. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.02.024.