ARL Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 22;277(1687):1589-96. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2041. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
The geographical region between mainland Asia and New Guinea is characterized by numerous small islands with isolated human populations. Phenotypically, groups in the west are similar to their neighbours in mainland Southeast Asia, eastern groups near New Guinea are similar to Melanesians, and intervening populations are intermediate in appearance. A long-standing question is whether this pattern primarily reflects mixing between groups with distinct origins or whether natural selection has shaped this range of variation by acting differentially on populations across the region. To address this question, we genotyped a set of 37 single nucleotide polymorphisms that are evolutionarily independent, putatively neutral and highly informative for Asian-Melanesian ancestry in 1430 individuals from 60 populations spanning mainland Asia to Melanesia. Admixture analysis reveals a sharp transition from Asian to Melanesian genetic variants over a narrow geographical region in eastern Indonesia. Interestingly, this admixture cline roughly corresponds to the human phenotypic boundary noted by Alfred Russell Wallace in 1869. We conclude that this phenotypic gradient probably reflects mixing of two long-separated ancestral source populations-one descended from the initial Melanesian-like inhabitants of the region, and the other related to Asian groups that immigrated during the Paleolithic and/or with the spread of agriculture. A higher frequency of Asian X-linked markers relative to autosomal markers throughout the transition zone suggests that the admixture process was sex-biased, either favouring a westward expansion of patrilocal Melanesian groups or an eastward expansion of matrilocal Asian immigrants. The matrilocal marriage practices that dominated early Austronesian societies may be one factor contributing to this observed sex bias in admixture rates.
亚洲大陆和新几内亚之间的地理区域以众多孤立的小岛屿和人口为特征。表型上,西部的群体与东南亚大陆的邻国相似,新几内亚东部的群体与美拉尼西亚人相似,而中间的群体则在外观上处于中间状态。一个长期存在的问题是,这种模式主要反映了具有不同起源的群体之间的混合,还是自然选择通过对该地区不同人群的差异作用塑造了这种变异范围。为了解决这个问题,我们对来自亚洲大陆到美拉尼西亚的 60 个群体的 1430 个人进行了一组 37 个单核苷酸多态性的基因分型,这些多态性在进化上是独立的,假定是中性的,并且对亚洲-美拉尼西亚血统高度具有信息量。混合分析显示,在印度尼西亚东部的一个狭窄地理区域内,从亚洲到美拉尼西亚的遗传变异存在明显的转变。有趣的是,这种混合渐变与阿尔弗雷德·拉塞尔·华莱士(Alfred Russell Wallace)在 1869 年指出的人类表型边界大致相符。我们的结论是,这种表型梯度可能反映了两个长期分离的祖先源群体的混合 - 一个来自该地区最初的美拉尼西亚样居民,另一个与在旧石器时代和/或农业传播期间移民的亚洲群体有关。在整个过渡带,相对于常染色体标记,亚洲 X 连锁标记的频率更高,这表明混合过程是性别偏向的,要么有利于来自美拉尼西亚的向西扩张的群体,要么有利于来自亚洲的以母系为中心的移民的向东扩张。在整个过渡带,相对于常染色体标记,亚洲 X 连锁标记的频率更高,这表明混合过程是性别偏向的,要么有利于来自美拉尼西亚的向西扩张的群体,要么有利于来自亚洲的以母系为中心的移民的向东扩张。在整个过渡带,相对于常染色体标记,亚洲 X 连锁标记的频率更高,这表明混合过程是性别偏向的,要么有利于来自美拉尼西亚的向西扩张的群体,要么有利于来自亚洲的以母系为中心的移民的向东扩张。在整个过渡带,相对于常染色体标记,亚洲 X 连锁标记的频率更高,这表明混合过程是性别偏向的,要么有利于来自美拉尼西亚的向西扩张的群体,要么有利于来自亚洲的以母系为中心的移民的向东扩张。母系婚姻习俗在早期的南岛语系社会中占主导地位,这可能是导致这种观察到的混合率性别偏向的一个因素。