• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在管理式医疗人群中,降压药物的改变与血压目标的实现。

Antihypertensive medication changes and blood pressure goal achievement in a managed care population.

机构信息

i3 Innovus, Health Economics and Outcomes, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2010 Oct;24(10):659-68. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.2. Epub 2010 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1038/jhh.2010.2
PMID:20107489
Abstract

This study examined achievement of blood pressure (BP) goals, changes in antihypertensive therapy and reasons for these changes among adults with hypertension initiating angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or calcium channel blockers (CCBs). Claims data were examined for changes to medication regimens. Patient charts for 501 patients provided BP levels and reasons for changing medications. BP goal achievement was highest for initiators of ARBs (81.4%), compared with ACEIs (75.5%; P=NS) and CCBs (68.9%; P<0.01). Changes in antihypertensive therapy were least likely among ARB recipients (59.9%) compared with ACEIs (71.86%; P=0.02) and CCBs (74.85%; P<0.01). Failure to achieve BP goals was the most common reason for change in therapy (ARB, 32.9%; ACEI, 42.5%, P=NS; CCB, 47.9%, P<0.01). Although most patients achieved target BP goals, many required changes in treatment regimens. Initial choice of antihypertensive therapy may mitigate changes in therapies and better achieve BP goals.

摘要

本研究旨在考察起始应用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)或钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)的高血压患者的血压(BP)达标情况、降压治疗的变化及其原因。通过索赔数据来观察药物治疗方案的变化。501 名患者的病历提供了 BP 水平和药物更换的原因。ARB 起始治疗患者的 BP 达标率最高(81.4%),ACEI 为(75.5%;P=NS),CCB 为(68.9%;P<0.01)。与 ACEI(71.86%;P=0.02)和 CCB(74.85%;P<0.01)相比,ARB 患者最不可能改变降压治疗(59.9%)。未能达到 BP 目标是治疗改变的最常见原因(ARB 为 32.9%;ACEI 为 42.5%,P=NS;CCB 为 47.9%,P<0.01)。尽管大多数患者达到了目标 BP 目标,但许多患者需要改变治疗方案。初始降压治疗的选择可能会减轻治疗方案的变化,并更好地达到 BP 目标。

相似文献

1
Antihypertensive medication changes and blood pressure goal achievement in a managed care population.在管理式医疗人群中,降压药物的改变与血压目标的实现。
J Hum Hypertens. 2010 Oct;24(10):659-68. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.2. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
2
Retrospective analysis of real-world efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers versus other classes of antihypertensive agents in blood pressure management.回顾性分析血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与其他降压药类别在血压管理中的真实世界疗效。
Clin Ther. 2011 Sep;33(9):1190-203. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
3
Current status of antihypertensive prescription and associated blood pressure control in Japan.日本抗高血压药物处方现状及相关血压控制情况
Hypertens Res. 2006 Mar;29(3):143-51. doi: 10.1291/hypres.29.143.
4
Blood pressure control in kidney transplantation: therapeutic implications.肾移植中的血压控制:治疗意义
J Hum Hypertens. 2004 Dec;18(12):871-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001767.
5
Patient satisfaction with antihypertensive therapy.患者对抗高血压治疗的满意度。
J Hum Hypertens. 2005 Oct;19(10):793-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001899.
6
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.
7
How well have practices followed guidelines in prescribing antihypertensive drugs: the role of health insurance.医疗机构在开具抗高血压药物时遵循指南的情况如何:医疗保险的作用。
Value Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;6(1):18-28. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.00212.x.
8
Usefulness of the alpha1-blocker doxazosin as a third-line antihypertensive drug.α1受体阻滞剂多沙唑嗪作为三线抗高血压药物的效用。
Hypertens Res. 2007 Apr;30(4):301-6. doi: 10.1291/hypres.30.301.
9
Blood pressure reduction and renin-angiotensin system inhibition for prevention of congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis.降低血压和抑制肾素-血管紧张素系统预防充血性心力衰竭:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2009 Mar;30(6):679-88. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn575. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
10
Effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibition on end-organ protection: can we do better?肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制对靶器官保护的作用:我们能否做得更好?
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1803-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.019.

引用本文的文献

1
How Behavior Change Strategies are Used to Design Digital Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Among Patients With Hypertension: Systematic Review.行为改变策略如何用于设计数字干预措施以提高高血压患者的药物依从性和血压:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 9;22(4):e17201. doi: 10.2196/17201.
2
Switching of antihypertensive drugs at Tertiary Care Government Hospital, Hyderabad, India: A cross-sectional retrospective investigation.印度海得拉巴市三级医疗政府医院的降压药物转换:一项横断面回顾性调查。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2017 Nov-Dec;49(6):438-444. doi: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_590_17.
3
Health Care Costs Associated with Addition, Titration, and Switching Antihypertensive Medications After First-Line Treatment: Results from a Commercially Insured Sample.
一线治疗后添加、滴定和转换抗高血压药物相关的医疗保健费用:来自商业保险样本的结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jun;23(6):691-699. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.6.691.
4
Achieving Adherence After First-Line Antihypertensive Treatment: Should Fixed-Dose Combinations Receive Priority?一线抗高血压治疗后实现依从性:固定剂量复方制剂应优先考虑吗?
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Sep;18(9):934-41. doi: 10.1111/jch.12799. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
5
Reasons for switching antihypertensive medication in general practice: a cross-sectional Czech nationwide survey.全科医疗中更换抗高血压药物的原因:一项捷克全国性横断面调查
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(27):e168. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000168.
6
Antihypertensive drug treatment changes in the general population: the CoLaus study.普通人群中降压药物治疗的变化:CoLaus研究
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Mar 31;15:20. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-20.