Suppr超能文献

降低血压和抑制肾素-血管紧张素系统预防充血性心力衰竭:一项荟萃分析。

Blood pressure reduction and renin-angiotensin system inhibition for prevention of congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Verdecchia Paolo, Angeli Fabio, Cavallini Claudio, Gattobigio Roberto, Gentile Giorgio, Staessen Jan A, Reboldi Gianpaolo

机构信息

Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, Cardiologia, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2009 Mar;30(6):679-88. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn575. Epub 2009 Jan 23.

Abstract

AIMS

It is unclear whether prevention of congestive heart failure (CHF) by drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) occurs over and beyond the reduction in blood pressure (BP) achieved by these drugs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a meta-analysis of trials comparing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), or calcium-channel blockers (CCBs), with diuretics, beta-blockers, or placebo in hypertensive or high-risk subjects without CHF at entry. Both fixed- and random-effect models were used. In trials vs. placebo, the risk of CHF was reduced by 21% with ACEIs (P = 0.007), whereas the effect of ARBs and CCBs was not significant (random-effect models). Thus, CCBs did not increase the risk of CHF. In trials vs. diuretics/beta-blockers, no differences were found between ACEIs and comparators [odds ratio (OR) 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.24], whereas CCBs were associated with an 18% higher risk of CHF (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.00-1.39; P = 0.048). Therefore, ACEIs were not superior to diuretics/beta-blockers for the prevention of CHF. Because heterogeneity between trials was significant, we investigated potential sources of heterogeneity by meta-regression. The risk of CHF decreased by 24% (P < 0.001) for each 5 mmHg reduction in systolic BP. The risk of CHF was 19% less with ACEIs/ARBs than CCBs (P < 0.001) and 16% less in studies without multiple risk factors required for entry (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

BP reduction is beneficial for the prevention of CHF. Over and beyond BP reduction, the protective effect of ACEIs and ARBs is greater than that of CCBs.

摘要

目的

通过抑制肾素 - 血管紧张素系统(RAS)的药物预防充血性心力衰竭(CHF)是否超出这些药物所实现的血压(BP)降低效果尚不清楚。

方法与结果

我们对在入组时无CHF的高血压或高危受试者中,比较血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)或钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)与利尿剂、β受体阻滞剂或安慰剂的试验进行了荟萃分析。使用了固定效应模型和随机效应模型。在与安慰剂对照的试验中,ACEIs使CHF风险降低了21%(P = 0.007),而ARBs和CCBs的效果不显著(随机效应模型)。因此,CCBs不会增加CHF风险。在与利尿剂/β受体阻滞剂对照的试验中,ACEIs与对照药物之间未发现差异[比值比(OR)1.02;95%置信区间(CI)0.84 - 1.24],而CCBs与CHF风险高18%相关(OR 1.18;95% CI 1.00 - 1.39;P = 0.048)。因此,在预防CHF方面,ACEIs并不优于利尿剂/β受体阻滞剂。由于试验之间的异质性显著,我们通过荟萃回归研究了异质性的潜在来源。收缩压每降低5 mmHg,CHF风险降低24%(P < 0.001)。ACEIs/ARBs组的CHF风险比CCBs组低19%(P < 0.001),在无需入组时具备多种风险因素的研究中低16%(P = 0.009)。

结论

降低血压对预防CHF有益。除降低血压外,ACEIs和ARBs的保护作用大于CCBs。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验