Suppr超能文献

2000 年至 2007 年 ALL-BFM 2000 方案中 asparaginase 的治疗药物监测。

Therapeutic drug monitoring of asparaginase in the ALL-BFM 2000 protocol between 2000 and 2007.

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Jul 1;54(7):952-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22417.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

On a voluntary basis therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was implemented in the ALL-BFM 2000 protocol for the three currently used asparaginase (ASNase) preparations (first line: native Escherichia coli ASNase; second line: pegylated ASNase and third line: Erwinia chrysanthemi ASNase).

PROCEDURE

Between 2000 and 2007, 2,074 ASNase samples from 763 patients out of 114 hospitals were evaluated (5,000 U/m2 E. coli ASNase (n = 318), 1,000 U/m2 pegylated ASNase (n = 416) and 10,000 U/m2 Erwinia chrysanthemi ASNase (n = 29)).

RESULTS

First-line therapy with 5,000 U/m2 E. coli ASNase resulted in an ASNase activity of <100 U/L in 10% of all samples from day +3 after administration. Second-line treatment with 1,000 U/m2 PEG ASNase led to activity values below 100 U/L in approximately 30% of all samples taken +7 days. Relating ASNase activity to route of administration, 10,000 U/m2 Erwinia ASNase IM compared to IV as third-line treatment, led to a higher median activity (IM: median 151.5 U/L, range (0-750 U/L); IV: median 115 U/L, range (0-884 U/L), P = 0.3) and fewer samples below 100 U/L (IM: 15% vs. IV: 45%) at day +2.

CONCLUSION

The reduced dose of 5,000 U/m2 E. coli ASNase for induction treatment succeeded to achieve an activity level above 100 U/L in more than 90% of all samples. They confirm that dose reduction is reasonable and provide the basis for future treatment strategies employing ASNase.

摘要

背景

在 ALL-BFM 2000 方案中,三种现有的门冬酰胺酶(ASNase)制剂(一线:天然大肠杆菌 ASNase;二线:聚乙二醇化 ASNase 和三线:欧文氏菌 ASNase)均基于自愿原则进行治疗药物监测(TDM)。

方法

在 2000 年至 2007 年间,114 家医院的 763 名患者的 2074 份 ASNase 样本进行了评估(5000U/m2 大肠杆菌 ASNase(n=318),1000U/m2 聚乙二醇化 ASNase(n=416)和 10000U/m2 欧文氏菌 ASNase(n=29))。

结果

一线治疗采用 5000U/m2 大肠杆菌 ASNase,在给药后第 3 天的所有样本中,ASNase 活性<100U/L 的占 10%。二线治疗采用 1000U/m2 PEG ASNase,在约 30%的所有样本中,活性值<100U/L。将 ASNase 活性与给药途径相关联,三线治疗中与静脉注射相比,肌肉注射 10000U/m2 欧文氏菌 ASNase 导致中位数更高的活性(肌肉注射:中位数 151.5U/L,范围(0-750U/L);静脉注射:中位数 115U/L,范围(0-884U/L),P=0.3),且第 2 天样本中<100U/L 的比例更低(肌肉注射:15% vs. 静脉注射:45%)。

结论

诱导治疗中 5000U/m2 大肠杆菌 ASNase 的减少剂量成功地使超过 90%的所有样本中的活性水平超过 100U/L。它们证实剂量减少是合理的,并为未来采用 ASNase 的治疗策略提供了依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验