高危急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿的过敏反应和抗天冬酰胺酶抗体:儿童肿瘤学组报告
Allergic reactions and antiasparaginase antibodies in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A children's oncology group report.
作者信息
Ko Richard H, Jones Tamekia L, Radvinsky David, Robison Nathan, Gaynon Paul S, Panosyan Eduard H, Avramis Ioannis A, Avramis Vassilios I, Rubin Joan, Ettinger Lawrence J, Seibel Nita L, Dhall Girish
机构信息
Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
出版信息
Cancer. 2015 Dec 1;121(23):4205-11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29641. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
BACKGROUND
The objectives of this study were to assess the incidence of clinical allergy and end-induction antiasparaginase (anti-ASNase) antibodies in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with pegylated (PEG) Escherichia coli ASNase and to determine whether they carry any prognostic significance.
METHODS
Of 2057 eligible patients, 1155 were allocated to augmented arms in which PEG ASNase replaced native ASNase postinduction. Erwinia chrysanthemi (Erwinia) ASNase could be used to replace native ASNase after allergy, if available. Allergy and survival data were complete for 990 patients. End-induction antibody titers were available for 600 patients.
RESULTS
During the consolidation phase, 289 of 990 patients (29.2%) had an allergic reaction. There were fewer allergic reactions to Erwinia ASNase than to native ASNase (odds ratio, 4.33; P < .0001) or PEG ASNase (odds ratio, 3.08; P < .0001) only during phase 1 of interim maintenance. There was no significant difference in 5-year event-free survival (EFS) between patients who received PEG ASNase throughout the entire study postinduction versus those who developed an allergic reaction to PEG ASNase during consolidation phase and subsequently received Erwinia ASNase (80.8% ± 2.8% and 81.6% ± 3.8%, respectively; P = .66). Patients who had positive antibody titers postinduction were more likely to have an allergic reaction to PEG ASNase (odds ratio, 2.4; P < .001). The 5-year EFS rate between patients who had negative versus positive antibody titers (80% ± 2.6% and 77.7% ± 4.3%, respectively; P = .68) and between patients who did not receive any ASNase postconsolidation and those who received PEG ASNase throughout the study (P = .22) were significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS
The current results demonstrate differences in the incidence rates of toxicity between ASNase preparations but not in EFS. The presence of anti-ASNase antibodies did not affect EFS.
背景
本研究的目的是评估接受聚乙二醇化(PEG)大肠杆菌天冬酰胺酶治疗的高危急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿临床过敏反应和诱导结束时抗天冬酰胺酶(抗ASNase)抗体的发生率,并确定它们是否具有任何预后意义。
方法
在2057例符合条件的患者中,1155例被分配至强化治疗组,诱导治疗后PEG天冬酰胺酶替代天然天冬酰胺酶。如果有菊欧文氏菌天冬酰胺酶,过敏后可用于替代天然天冬酰胺酶。990例患者的过敏反应和生存数据完整。600例患者有诱导结束时的抗体滴度数据。
结果
在巩固治疗阶段,990例患者中有289例(29.2%)发生过敏反应。仅在中期维持治疗的第1阶段,菊欧文氏菌天冬酰胺酶引起的过敏反应少于天然天冬酰胺酶(比值比,4.33;P<0.0001)或PEG天冬酰胺酶(比值比,3.08;P<0.0001)。诱导治疗后整个研究期间接受PEG天冬酰胺酶治疗的患者与巩固治疗阶段对PEG天冬酰胺酶发生过敏反应并随后接受菊欧文氏菌天冬酰胺酶治疗的患者相比,5年无事件生存率(EFS)无显著差异(分别为80.8%±2.8%和81.6%±3.8%;P = 0.66)。诱导治疗后抗体滴度呈阳性的患者对PEG天冬酰胺酶发生过敏反应的可能性更大(比值比,2.4;P<0.001)。抗体滴度呈阴性与阳性的患者之间的5年EFS率(分别为80%±2.6%和77.7%±4.3%;P = 0.68)以及巩固治疗后未接受任何天冬酰胺酶治疗的患者与整个研究期间接受PEG天冬酰胺酶治疗的患者之间的5年EFS率(P = 0.22)均无显著差异。
结论
目前的结果表明天冬酰胺酶制剂之间的毒性发生率存在差异,但EFS无差异。抗ASNase抗体的存在不影响EFS。