• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞士的小儿癌症专科医疗服务可及性。

Access to specialized pediatric cancer care in Switzerland.

机构信息

Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 May;54(5):721-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22426.

DOI:10.1002/pbc.22426
PMID:20108340
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Specialized pediatric cancer centers (PCCs) are thought to be essential to obtain state-of-the-art care for children and adolescents. We determined the proportion of childhood cancer patients not treated in a PCC, and described their characteristics and place of treatment.

PROCEDURE

The Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry (SCCR) registers all children treated in Swiss PCCs. The regional cancer registries (covering 14/26 cantons) register all cancer patients of a region. The children of the SCCR with data from 7 regions (11 cantons) were compared, using specialized software for record linkage. All children <16 years of age at diagnosis with primary malignant tumors, diagnosed between 1990 and 2004, and living in one of these regions were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

22.1% (238/1,077) of patients recorded in regional registries were not registered in the SCCR. Of these, 15.7% (169/1,077) had never been in a PCC while 6.4% (69/1,077) had been in a PCC but were not registered in the SCCR, due to incomplete data flow. In all diagnostic groups and in all age groups, a certain proportion of children was treated outside a PCC, but this proportion was largest in children suffering from malignant bone tumors/soft tissue sarcomas and from malignant epithelial neoplasms, and in older children. The proportion of patients treated in a PCC increased over the study period (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

One in six childhood cancer patients in Switzerland was not treated in a PCC. Whether these patients have different treatment outcomes remained unclear.

摘要

背景

专门的儿科癌症中心(PCC)被认为对于儿童和青少年获得最先进的治疗至关重要。我们确定了未在 PCC 接受治疗的儿童癌症患者的比例,并描述了他们的特征和治疗地点。

方法

瑞士儿童癌症登记处(SCCR)登记了所有在瑞士 PCC 接受治疗的儿童。区域癌症登记处(覆盖 26 个州中的 14 个)登记了该地区的所有癌症患者。使用专门的记录链接软件,对 SCCR 中来自 7 个地区(11 个州)的数据进行了比较。所有在诊断时年龄<16 岁的儿童患有原发性恶性肿瘤,在 1990 年至 2004 年间诊断,并居住在这些地区之一,都被纳入分析。

结果

在区域登记处记录的 22.1%(238/1,077)的患者未在 SCCR 中登记。其中,15.7%(169/1,077)从未去过 PCC,而 6.4%(69/1,077)去过 PCC,但由于数据传输不完整而未在 SCCR 中登记。在所有诊断组和所有年龄组中,一定比例的儿童在 PCC 之外接受治疗,但在患有恶性骨肿瘤/软组织肉瘤和恶性上皮肿瘤以及年龄较大的儿童中,这一比例最大。在研究期间,在 PCC 接受治疗的患者比例有所增加(P<0.0001)。

结论

瑞士六分之一的儿童癌症患者未在 PCC 接受治疗。这些患者的治疗结果是否不同仍不清楚。

相似文献

1
Access to specialized pediatric cancer care in Switzerland.瑞士的小儿癌症专科医疗服务可及性。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 May;54(5):721-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22426.
2
Incidence of childhood cancer in Switzerland: the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry.瑞士儿童癌症发病率:瑞士儿童癌症登记处
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008 Jan;50(1):46-51. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21129.
3
Site of oncologic specialty care for older adolescents in Utah.犹他州针对大龄青少年的肿瘤专科护理地点。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4616-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.4103.
4
Impact of age and diagnosis on waiting times between important healthcare events among children 0 to 19 years cared for in pediatric units: the Canadian Childhood Cancer Surveillance and Control Program.年龄和诊断对儿科病房中0至19岁儿童重要医疗事件之间等待时间的影响:加拿大儿童癌症监测与控制项目
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006 Jul;28(7):433-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mph.0000212945.20480.26.
5
Access to pediatric cancer care by age, race, and diagnosis, and outcomes of cancer treatment in pediatric and adolescent patients in the state of Georgia.佐治亚州儿科和青少年患者按年龄、种族和诊断分类的儿童癌症护理可及性以及癌症治疗结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4610-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.6992.
6
[Malignant tumors in children living in the province of Trieste, 1972-1993: descriptive epidemiology and the quality of diagnostic-therapeutic services].[1972 - 1993年的里雅斯特省儿童恶性肿瘤:描述性流行病学及诊断治疗服务质量]
Epidemiol Prev. 1997 Jul-Sep;21(3):202-10.
7
[Lorraine childhood cancer registry: incidence, survival 1983-1999].[洛林儿童癌症登记处:1983 - 1999年发病率及生存率]
Arch Pediatr. 2005 Nov;12(11):1577-86. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2005.06.010. Epub 2005 Aug 11.
8
Evaluating access to pediatric cancer care centers of children and adolescents with rare tumors in Italy: the TREP project.评估意大利患有罕见肿瘤的儿童和青少年获得儿科癌症护理中心服务的情况:TREP项目。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Aug;53(2):152-5. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22049.
9
Progress in childhood cancer care in Florida. 1970-1992.佛罗里达州儿童癌症护理进展。1970 - 1992年。
J Fla Med Assoc. 1993 Nov;80(11):747-51.
10
Childhood cancer in the United States. A geographical analysis of cases from the Pediatric Cooperative Clinical Trials groups.美国儿童癌症。对儿科合作临床试验组病例的地理分析。
Cancer. 1996 Jan 1;77(1):201-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<201::AID-CNCR32>3.0.CO;2-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends of travel burdens to access cancer care among children with cancer: analysis of a population-based cancer registry data in Aichi, Japan.日本爱知县基于人群的癌症登记数据中癌症患儿获得癌症治疗的交通负担趋势分析。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2023 Aug;85(3):542-554. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.85.3.542.
2
Access to paediatric oncology centres in Switzerland: Disparities across rural-urban and Swiss-foreigners cohorts.瑞士儿科肿瘤中心的可及性:农村-城市和瑞士-外国人队列之间的差异。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13679. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13679. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
3
Factors influencing harmonized health data collection, sharing and linkage in Denmark and Switzerland: A systematic review.
影响丹麦和瑞士协调健康数据收集、共享和链接的因素:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0226015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226015. eCollection 2019.
4
Childhood cancer and nuclear power plants in Switzerland: a census-based cohort study.瑞士儿童癌症与核电站:基于人口普查的队列研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;40(5):1247-60. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr115. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
5
Optimal therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults.青少年和年轻成人急性淋巴细胞白血病的最佳治疗方法。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011 May 31;8(7):417-24. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.77.