Suppr超能文献

个体和基于区域的社会经济数据在监测健康不平等方面的比较。

A comparison of individual and area-based socio-economic data for monitoring social inequalities in health.

机构信息

Unité des etudes et analyses de l'état de santé de la population, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, 945 Wolfe Avenue, Quebec, Quebec, G1V 5B3.

出版信息

Health Rep. 2009 Dec;20(4):85-94.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Area-based indicators are commonly used to measure and track health outcomes by socioeconomic group. This is largely because of the absence of socio-economic information about individuals in health administrative databases. The literature shows that the magnitude of differences in health outcomes varies depending on whether the socio-economic indicators are at the individual level or are area-based. This study compares the two types of indicators.

DATA AND METHODS

The data are from a file linking the results of the 1991 Census with deaths that occurred from 1991 to 2000--a 15% sample of the Canadian population aged 25 or older. The socio-economic indicator used for comparison is a material and social deprivation index, in individual and area-based versions. The health indicators are life expectancy and disability-free life expectancy, and risks of mortality and disability.

RESULTS

The individual version of the deprivation index yields wider gaps in life expectancy and disability-free life expectancy than does the area-based version. These gaps vary by sex and geographic setting. However, both versions are associated with inequalities in mortality and disability, independent of each other.

INTERPRETATION

Despite some limitations, area-based socioeconomic indicators are useful in assessing inequalities in health. The inequalities that they identify are significant, consistent and reliable and can be tracked through time and for different geographic settings.

摘要

背景

基于区域的指标常用于按社会经济群体衡量和跟踪健康结果。这主要是因为健康管理数据库中缺乏关于个人的社会经济信息。文献表明,健康结果的差异程度取决于社会经济指标是基于个体还是基于区域。本研究比较了这两种类型的指标。

数据和方法

该数据来自于将 1991 年人口普查结果与 1991 年至 2000 年期间死亡情况相链接的文件,这是加拿大年龄在 25 岁及以上人群的 15%样本。用于比较的社会经济指标是个人和基于区域的物质和社会剥夺指数。健康指标是预期寿命和无残疾预期寿命,以及死亡率和残疾风险。

结果

与基于区域的版本相比,剥夺指数的个体版本导致预期寿命和无残疾预期寿命的差距更大。这些差距因性别和地理环境而异。然而,这两个版本都与死亡率和残疾的不平等有关,彼此独立。

解释

尽管存在一些限制,但基于区域的社会经济指标在评估健康不平等方面是有用的。它们所确定的不平等是显著的、一致的和可靠的,可以随着时间和不同的地理环境进行跟踪。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验