Department of Urology, Hospital Passauer Wolf, Bad Griesbach, Germany.
Clin Ther. 2009 Nov;31(11):2519-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.005.
The aims of this study were to determine whether oral trospium chloride is noninferior to oxy-butynin for urinary urge incontinence and to evaluate its efficacy, tolerability, and health-related quality of life parameters.
In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, Phase IIIb trial conducted in Germany, male and female outpatients aged >or=18 years with documented urinary frequency (>or=8 micturitions/24 hours) plus urge incontinence (>or=5 episodes/week) were randomized to receive oral treatment with trospium chloride 15 mg TID or oxybutynin hydrochloride 2.5 mg TID for 12 weeks. Daily doses could be adjusted upward after 4 weeks, to 90 mg of trospium (30 mg TID) and 15 mg of oxybutynin (5 mg TID), respectively, if needed. The absolute reduction in weekly episodes of urinary urge incontinence was evaluated as the primary efficacy variable. Secondary variables included the absolute reduction of micturitions per 24 hours, intensity of urgency, and mean voided volume. Qualitative symptom changes were recorded from the patients' entries in their micturition diaries at baseline, at week 4, and at week 12 of treatment. Subjective treatment outcome was assessed by patient ratings on a visual analog scale (VAS), the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and the 36-Item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36); intensity of dry mouth was also recorded on a scale. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed.
Of the 1658 patients treated, 828 patients (49.9%) received trospium 45 mg/d and 830 patients (50.1%) received oxybutynin 7.5 mg/d. After 4 weeks, daily doses were doubled in 29.2% (242/828) of patients in the trospium chloride group, and in 23.3% (193/830) of patients in the oxybutynin group, until the end of treatment. No clinically relevant differences in demographic characteristics were observed between the treatment groups. Trospium was noninferior to oxybutynin hydrochloride in terms of the reduction in the number of weekly urge incontinence episodes after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. In the per-protocol population, the median change after 12 weeks was -11.0 in both groups. In the full analysis set, the median change was -10.42 with trospium chloride and -10.00 with oxybutynin (P < 0.001 for the noninferiority hypothesis, for both the per-protocol and the full analysis set calculations). There was also no indication of a difference between groups concerning the observed reductions of daily micturitions and intensity of urgency as well as the increase in micturition volume at the end of 12 weeks. VAS, KHQ, and SF-36 scores were improved to a similar extent in both treatment groups at the end of treatment. Worsening of dry mouth was less common in the trospium group than in the oxybutynin group after 4 and 12 weeks (46.9% vs 63.9% and 51.2% vs 64.4%, respectively; bothtime points, P < 0.001 between groups). Treatment-related AEs were reported by 22.7% (188/828) of the trospium chloride group and 26.5% (220/830) of the oxybutynin group. Dry mouth was the most frequently occurring AE, reported by 4.1% (34/828) of patients in the trospium group and 7.7% (64/830) of the oxybutynin group.
Our findings indicate that trospium chloride was noninferior to oxybutynin hydrochloride, both with flexible dosing, over 12 weeks in these patients with urinary urge incontinence. Both drugs were generally well tolerated in the population studied, but fewer patients who received trospium reported worsening of dry mouth than those who received oxybutynin. German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Registration Number 4022383.
本研究旨在确定口服曲司氯铵治疗急迫性尿失禁是否不劣于奥昔布宁,并评估其疗效、耐受性和健康相关生活质量参数。
这是一项在德国进行的、随机、双盲、阳性对照、平行分组、多中心、IIIb 期试验,纳入年龄≥18 岁、有记录的尿频(≥8 次/24 小时)和急迫性尿失禁(≥5 次/周)病史的男性和女性门诊患者,将其随机分配接受口服曲司氯铵 15 mg,每日 3 次(TID)或奥昔布宁盐酸盐 2.5 mg,每日 3 次(TID)治疗,4 周后,如果需要,可将每日剂量分别上调至 90 mg 曲司氯铵(30 mg,TID)和 15 mg 奥昔布宁(5 mg,TID)。主要疗效变量为每周急迫性尿失禁发作次数的绝对减少。次要变量包括 24 小时排尿次数、尿急强度和平均排尿量的绝对减少。从患者治疗基线、第 4 周和第 12 周的排尿日记中记录定性症状变化。通过患者对视觉模拟量表(VAS)、King's 健康问卷(KHQ)和 36 项健康研究短式一般健康调查(SF-36)的评分评估主观治疗结局;还记录了口干的严重程度。评估不良事件(AE)。
在接受治疗的 1658 例患者中,828 例(49.9%)患者接受曲司氯铵 45 mg/d,830 例(50.1%)患者接受奥昔布宁 7.5 mg/d。第 4 周后,曲司氯铵组 29.2%(242/828)的患者和奥昔布宁组 23.3%(193/830)的患者将每日剂量加倍,直至治疗结束。治疗组之间在人口统计学特征方面无明显差异。在治疗 4 周和 12 周后,曲司氯铵在减少每周急迫性尿失禁发作次数方面不劣于奥昔布宁盐酸盐。在符合方案人群中,两组的中位数变化均为 12 周时的-11.0。在全分析集,曲司氯铵组的中位数变化为-10.42,奥昔布宁组为-10.00(符合方案和全分析集计算,均为 P<0.001 用于非劣效性假设)。在 12 周时,两组的每日排尿次数和尿急强度的观察减少以及排尿量的增加也没有差异。治疗结束时,VAS、KHQ 和 SF-36 评分均得到了相似程度的改善。在治疗的第 4 周和 12 周时,口干恶化的发生率在曲司氯铵组比奥昔布宁组更低(分别为 46.9%比 63.9%和 51.2%比 64.4%;两个时间点,组间均 P<0.001)。曲司氯铵组和奥昔布宁组分别有 22.7%(188/828)和 26.5%(220/830)的患者报告了与治疗相关的不良事件。口干是最常见的不良事件,曲司氯铵组有 4.1%(34/828)的患者报告,奥昔布宁组有 7.7%(64/830)的患者报告。
我们的研究结果表明,在这些急迫性尿失禁患者中,曲司氯铵与奥昔布宁盐酸盐相比,具有相似的疗效,且在灵活剂量下,12 周的治疗时间均不劣。在研究人群中,两种药物均具有良好的耐受性,但报告口干恶化的曲司氯铵组患者少于奥昔布宁组。德国联邦药物和医疗器械注册编号 4022383。