Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1011Lausanne, Switzerland.
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Mar 1;171(5):540-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp428. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
Although both inflammatory and atherosclerosis markers have been associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, data directly comparing their predictive value are limited. The authors compared the value of 2 atherosclerosis markers (ankle-arm index (AAI) and aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV)) and 3 inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)) in predicting CHD events. Among 2,191 adults aged 70-79 years at baseline (1997-1998) from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study cohort, the authors examined adjudicated incident myocardial infarction or CHD death ("hard" events) and "hard" events plus hospitalization for angina or coronary revascularization (total CHD events). During 8 years of follow-up between 1997-1998 and June 2007, 351 participants developed total CHD events (197 "hard" events). IL-6 (highest quartile vs. lowest: hazard ratio = 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.33, 2.49; P-trend < 0.001) and AAI (AAI < or = 0.9 vs. AAI 1.01-1.30: hazard ratio = 1.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.14, 2.18) predicted CHD events above traditional risk factors and modestly improved global measures of predictive accuracy. CRP, TNF-alpha, and aPWV had weaker associations. IL-6 and AAI accurately reclassified 6.6% and 3.3% of participants, respectively (P's < or = 0.05). Results were similar for "hard" CHD, with higher reclassification rates for AAI. IL-6 and AAI are associated with future CHD events beyond traditional risk factors and modestly improve risk prediction in older adults.
尽管炎症和动脉粥样硬化标志物都与冠心病(CHD)风险相关,但直接比较它们预测价值的数据有限。作者比较了 2 种动脉粥样硬化标志物(踝臂指数(AAI)和主动脉脉搏波速度(aPWV))和 3 种炎症标志物(C 反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α))在预测 CHD 事件中的价值。在基线时(1997-1998 年)年龄为 70-79 岁的 2191 名成年人中,作者检查了经裁决的心肌梗死或 CHD 死亡(“硬”事件)和“硬”事件加上心绞痛住院或冠状动脉血运重建(总 CHD 事件)。在 1997-1998 年至 2007 年 6 月期间 8 年的随访期间,351 名参与者发生了总 CHD 事件(197 例“硬”事件)。IL-6(最高四分位数与最低四分位数相比:风险比=1.82,95%置信区间:1.33,2.49;P<0.001)和 AAI(AAI<或=0.9 与 AAI 1.01-1.30:风险比=1.57,95%置信区间:1.14,2.18)预测 CHD 事件高于传统危险因素,并适度提高了全球预测准确性的衡量标准。CRP、TNF-α和 aPWV 的相关性较弱。IL-6 和 AAI 分别准确地重新分类了 6.6%和 3.3%的参与者(P 值均<0.05)。对于“硬”CHD,AAI 的重新分类率更高,结果相似。IL-6 和 AAI 与传统危险因素之外的未来 CHD 事件相关,并适度提高了老年人的风险预测。