• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去骨瓣减压术中的快速闭合技术。

Rapid closure technique in decompressive craniectomy.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2011 Apr;114(4):954-60. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.JNS091065. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

DOI:10.3171/2009.12.JNS091065
PMID:20113157
Abstract

OBJECT

The object of this study was to describe the rapid closure technique in decompressive craniectomy without duraplasty and its use in a large cohort of consecutive patients.

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2008, supratentorial rapid closure decompressive craniectomy (RCDC) was performed 341 times in 318 patients at the authors' institution. Cases were stratified as 1) traumatic brain injury, 2) subarachnoid hemorrhage, 3) intracerebral hemorrhage, 4) cerebral infarction, and 5) other. A large bone flap was removed and the dura mater was opened in a stellate fashion. Duraplasty was not performed-that is, the dura was not sutured, and a dural substitute was neither sutured in nor layed on. The dura and exposed brain tissue were covered with hemostyptic material (Surgicel). Surgical time and complications of this procedure including follow-up (> 6 months) were recorded. After 3-6 months cranioplasty was performed, and, again, surgical time and any complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Rapid closure decompressive craniectomy was feasible in all cases. Complications included superficial wound healing disturbance (3.5% of procedures), abscess (2.6%) and CSF fistula (0.6%); the mean surgical time (± SD) was 69 ± 20 minutes. Cranioplasty was performed in 196 cases; the mean interval (± SD) from craniectomy to cranioplasty was 118 ± 40 days. Complications of cranioplasty included epidural hematoma (4.1%), abscess (2.6%), wound healing disturbance (6.1%), and CSF fistula (1%). Compared with the results reported in the literature for decompressive craniectomy with duraplasty followed by cranioplasty, there were no significant differences in the frequency of complications. However, surgical time for RCDC was significantly shorter (69 ± 20 vs 129 ± 43 minutes, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present analysis of the largest series reported to date reveals that the rapid closure technique is feasible and safe in decompressive craniectomy. The surgical time is significantly shorter without increased complication rates or additional complications. Cranioplasty after a RCDC procedure was also feasible, fast, safe and not impaired by the RCDC technique.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述去骨瓣减压术中不进行硬脑膜修补的快速关颅技术,并将其应用于大量连续患者。

方法

1999 年至 2008 年,作者所在机构对 318 例患者的 341 例进行了幕上快速关颅减压术(RCDC)。病例分为 1)创伤性脑损伤,2)蛛网膜下腔出血,3)脑出血,4)脑梗死和 5)其他。大骨瓣切除,硬脑膜呈星状切开。未进行硬脑膜成形术,即硬脑膜未缝合,也未缝合或放置硬脑膜替代品。硬脑膜和暴露的脑组织用止血材料(Surgicel)覆盖。记录该手术的手术时间和包括随访(>6 个月)在内的并发症。3-6 个月后行颅骨成形术,并再次记录手术时间和任何并发症。

结果

所有病例均可行快速关颅减压术。并发症包括浅表伤口愈合障碍(3.5%的手术)、脓肿(2.6%)和 CSF 瘘(0.6%);平均手术时间(±SD)为 69±20 分钟。196 例行颅骨成形术;颅骨切除术与颅骨成形术之间的平均间隔(±SD)为 118±40 天。颅骨成形术的并发症包括硬膜外血肿(4.1%)、脓肿(2.6%)、伤口愈合障碍(6.1%)和 CSF 瘘(1%)。与文献中报道的硬脑膜修补术后行减压性颅骨切除术的结果相比,并发症的发生率无显著差异。然而,RCDC 的手术时间明显缩短(69±20 与 129±43 分钟,p<0.0001)。

结论

目前对迄今为止报道的最大系列的分析表明,快速关颅技术在去骨瓣减压术中是可行且安全的。手术时间明显缩短,并发症发生率或额外并发症无增加。RCDC 术后行颅骨成形术也是可行的、快速的、安全的,并且不会因 RCDC 技术而受到影响。

相似文献

1
Rapid closure technique in decompressive craniectomy.去骨瓣减压术中的快速闭合技术。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Apr;114(4):954-60. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.JNS091065. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
2
Evaluation of simultaneous cranioplasty and ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedures.同期颅骨成形术和脑室腹腔分流术的评估
J Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;121(2):313-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.JNS131480. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
3
Randomized controlled study comparing 2 surgical techniques for decompressive craniectomy: with watertight duraplasty and without watertight duraplasty.随机对照研究比较了 2 种去骨瓣减压术的手术技术:硬脑膜严密修补和不严密修补。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;129(4):1017-1023. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.JNS152954. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
4
Decompressive craniectomy using gelatin film and future bone flap replacement.使用明胶膜行去骨瓣减压术及未来骨瓣复位。
J Neurosurg. 2013 Apr;118(4):776-82. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.JNS121475. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
5
Cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: underestimated surgery-associated complications?减压性颅骨切除术后的颅骨成形术:手术相关并发症是否被低估?
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;115(8):1293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.12.002. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
6
Factors influencing the outcome (GOS) in reconstructive cranioplasty.影响颅骨重建成形术预后(格拉斯哥预后评分)的因素。
Neurosurg Rev. 2016 Jan;39(1):133-9. doi: 10.1007/s10143-015-0678-3. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
7
Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: the relationship between surgical complications and the prediction of an unfavourable outcome.严重创伤性脑损伤的减压性颅骨切除术:手术并发症与不良预后预测之间的关系
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
8
Cranioplasty complications following wartime decompressive craniectomy.战时去骨瓣减压术后颅骨修补术并发症。
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 May;28(5):E3. doi: 10.3171/2010.2.FOCUS1026.
9
Risk factors and rates of bone flap resorption in pediatric patients after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤减压颅骨切除术后小儿患者骨瓣吸收的危险因素及发生率
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013 May;11(5):526-32. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.PEDS12483. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
10
Cranioplasty and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement after Decompressive Craniectomy: Staged Surgery Is Associated with Fewer Postoperative Complications.减压性颅骨切除术后颅骨成形术和脑室腹腔分流术:分期手术与较少的术后并发症相关。
World Neurosurg. 2015 Oct;84(4):1051-4. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.066. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Timing of cerebrospinal fluid diversion with ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in cranioplasty reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.颅骨成形术重建中脑室腹腔分流术脑脊液引流的时机:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Neurol Int. 2025 Mar 28;16:114. doi: 10.25259/SNI_771_2024. eCollection 2025.
2
Decompressive Craniectomy with or Without Dural Closure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.去骨瓣减压术伴或不伴硬脑膜缝合:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr;42(2):635-643. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02081-4. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3
Duration of spreading depression is the electrophysiological correlate of infarct growth in malignant hemispheric stroke.
扩散性抑制的持续时间是恶性半球性卒中梗死灶扩大的电生理相关因素。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024 Dec;44(12):1550-1560. doi: 10.1177/0271678X241262203. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
4
Exploring complications following cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: A retrospective bicenter assessment of autologous, PMMA and CAD implants.探讨去骨瓣减压术后颅骨修补术的并发症:自体、PMMA 和 CAD 植入物的回顾性双中心评估。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jan 29;47(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02309-z.
5
Outcome and management of decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant hemispheric stroke following cardiothoracic surgery.心胸手术后恶性大脑中动脉梗死去骨瓣减压术的结果和处理。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 10;13(1):12994. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40202-9.
6
Craniectomy size and decompression of the temporal base using the altered posterior question-mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.采用改良后的后问号切口行减压性半颅骨切除术时的颅骨切除术大小和颞底减压。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 14;13(1):11419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37689-7.
7
How much space is needed for decompressive surgery in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: Enabling single-stage surgery.恶性大脑中动脉梗死减压手术需要多少空间:实现一期手术。
Brain Spine. 2023 Apr 4;3:101730. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101730. eCollection 2023.
8
Large diameter hemicraniectomy does not improve long-term outcome in malignant infarction.大骨瓣开颅减压术不能改善恶性脑梗死的长期预后。
J Neurol. 2023 Aug;270(8):4080-4089. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11766-3. Epub 2023 May 10.
9
Postoperative Hematoma Expansion in Patients Undergoing Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.自发性脑出血行去骨瓣减压术患者术后血肿扩大
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 26;12(10):1298. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101298.
10
Endoscope-Assisted Evacuation of Acute-on-Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Single-Center Series.内镜辅助下慢性硬膜下血肿急性发作的血肿清除术:单中心系列研究
Cureus. 2022 Aug 1;14(8):e27575. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27575. eCollection 2022 Aug.