Department of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, USA.
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 May;28(5):E3. doi: 10.3171/2010.2.FOCUS1026.
In support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom-Afghanistan (OEF-A), military neurosurgeons in the combat theater are faced with the daunting task of stabilizing patients in such a way as to prevent irreversible neurological injury from cerebral edema while simultaneously allowing for prolonged transport stateside (5000-7000 miles). It is in this setting that decompressive craniectomy has become a mainstay of far-forward neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). As such, institutional experience with cranioplasty at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) and the National Naval Medical Center (NNMC) has expanded concomitantly. Battlefield blast explosions create cavitary injury zones that often extend beyond the border of the exposed surface wound, and this situation has created unique reconstruction challenges not often seen in civilian TBI. The loss of both soft-tissue and skull base support along with the need for cranial vault reconstruction requires a multidisciplinary approach involving neurosurgery, plastics, oral-maxillofacial surgery, and ophthalmology. With this situation in mind, the authors of this paper endeavored to review the cranial reconstruction complications encountered in these combat-related injuries.
A retrospective database review was conducted for all soldiers injured in OIF and OEF-A who had undergone decompressive craniectomy with subsequent cranioplasty between April 2002 and October 2008 at the WRAMC and NNMC. During this time, both facilities received a total of 408 OIF/OEF-A patients with severe head injuries; 188 of these patients underwent decompressive craniectomies in the theater before transfer to the US. Criteria for inclusion in this study consisted of either a closed or a penetrating head injury sustained in combat operations, resulting in the performance of a decompressive craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty at either the WRAMC or NNMC. Excluded from the study were patients for whom primary demographic data could not be verified. Demographic data, indications for craniectomy, as well as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters following cranioplasty, were recorded. Perioperative and postoperative complications were also recorded.
One hundred eight patients (male/female ratio 107:1) met the inclusion criteria for this study, 93 with a penetrating head injury and 15 with a closed head injury. Explosive blast injury was the predominant mechanism of injury, occurring in 72 patients (67%). The average time that elapsed between injury and cranioplasty was 190 days (range 7-546 days). An overall complication rate of 24% was identified. The prevalence of perioperative infection (12%), seizure (7.4%), and extraaxial hematoma formation (7.4%) was noted. Twelve patients (11%) required prosthetic removal because of either extraaxial hematoma formation or infection. Eight of the 13 cases of infection involved cranioplasties performed between 90 and 270 days from the date of injury (p = 0.06).
This study represents the largest to date in which cranioplasty and its complications have been evaluated in a trauma population that underwent decompressive craniectomy. The overall complication rate of 24% is consistent with rates reported in the literature (16-34%); however, the perioperative infection rate of 12% is higher than the rates reported in other studies. This difference is likely related to aspects of the initial injury pattern-such as skull base injury, orbitofacial fractures, sinus injuries, persistent fluid collection, and CSF leakage-which can predispose these patients to infection.
在支持伊拉克自由行动(OIF)和持久自由行动-阿富汗(OEF-A)的过程中,战区的军事神经外科医生面临着一项艰巨的任务,即在防止脑水肿引起的不可逆神经损伤的同时,使患者保持稳定,同时允许长时间的国内转运(5000-7000 英里)。正是在这种情况下,去骨瓣减压术已成为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)远前神经外科治疗的主要方法。因此,沃尔特里德陆军医疗中心(WRAMC)和国家海军医疗中心(NNMC)的颅骨成形术机构经验也随之扩大。战场爆炸爆炸造成的空洞性损伤区域常常超出暴露表面伤口的边界,这种情况造成了在平民 TBI 中很少见的独特重建挑战。软组织和颅底支撑的丧失以及需要进行颅骨穹窿重建,需要神经外科、整形外科、口腔颌面外科和眼科等多学科的参与。考虑到这种情况,本文作者试图回顾这些与战斗相关的损伤中遇到的颅骨重建并发症。
对 2002 年 4 月至 2008 年 10 月期间在 WRAMC 和 NNMC 接受减压性颅骨切除术和随后颅骨成形术的所有在 OIF 和 OEF-A 中受伤的士兵进行回顾性数据库审查。在此期间,这两个设施共收治了 408 名患有严重头部损伤的 OIF/OEF-A 患者;其中 188 名患者在转移到美国之前在战区接受了减压性颅骨切除术。本研究的纳入标准为在战斗行动中发生的闭合性或穿透性头部损伤,导致在 WRAMC 或 NNMC 进行减压性颅骨切除术和随后的颅骨成形术。研究中排除了无法验证主要人口统计学数据的患者。记录了人口统计学数据、颅骨切除术的指征以及颅骨成形术后的术前、术中及术后参数。还记录了围手术期和术后并发症。
108 名患者(男/女比例为 107:1)符合本研究的纳入标准,93 名患者有穿透性头部损伤,15 名患者有闭合性头部损伤。爆炸冲击伤是主要的损伤机制,发生在 72 名患者(67%)中。从损伤到颅骨成形术的平均时间为 190 天(范围 7-546 天)。确定了 24%的总体并发症发生率。注意到围手术期感染(12%)、癫痫发作(7.4%)和硬膜外血肿形成(7.4%)的发生率。由于硬膜外血肿形成或感染,有 12 名患者(11%)需要去除假体。13 例感染中有 8 例发生在受伤后 90-270 天(p=0.06)。
本研究是迄今为止评估接受减压性颅骨切除术的创伤患者的颅骨成形术及其并发症的最大研究。24%的总体并发症发生率与文献报道的发生率(16-34%)一致;然而,12%的围手术期感染率高于其他研究报道的感染率。这种差异可能与初始损伤模式的某些方面有关,如颅底损伤、眶面骨折、鼻窦损伤、持续的液体积聚和 CSF 漏,这些因素可能使这些患者容易感染。