Silveira Andressa, Koenig Judith B, Arroyo Luis G, Trout Donald, Moens Noël M M, LaMarre Jonathan, Brooks Andrew
Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Am J Vet Res. 2010 Feb;71(2):229-34. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.71.2.229.
To determine effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on healing of wounds in the distal portion of the forelimb in horses.
6 horses.
Five 6.25-cm2 superficial wounds were created over both third metacarpi of 6 horses. Forelimbs were randomly assigned to treatment (ESWT and bandage) or control (bandage only) groups. In treated limbs, each wound was treated with 625 shock wave pulses from an unfocused electrohydraulic shock wave generator. In control limbs, each wound received sham treatment. Wound appearance was recorded weekly as inflamed or healthy and scored for the amount of protruding granulation tissue. Standardized digital photographs were used to determine the area of neoepithelialization and absolute wound area. Biopsy was performed on 1 wound on each limb every week for 6 weeks to evaluate epithelialization, fibroplasia, neovascularization, and inflammation. Immunohistochemical staining for A smooth muscle actin was used to label myofibroblasts.
Control wounds were 1.9 times as likely to appear inflamed, compared with treated wounds. Control wounds had significantly higher scores for exuberant granulation tissue. Treatment did not affect wound size or area of neoepithelialization. No significant difference was found for any of the histologic or immunohistochemical variables between groups.
Treatment with ESWT did not accelerate healing of equine distal limb wounds, but treated wounds had less exuberant granulation tissue and appeared healthier than controls. Therefore, ESWT may be useful to prevent exuberant granulation tissue formation and chronic inflammation of such wounds, but further studies are necessary before recommending ESWT for clinical application.
确定体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)对马前肢远端伤口愈合的影响。
6匹马。
在6匹马的双侧第三掌骨上制造5个面积为6.25平方厘米的浅表伤口。前肢被随机分为治疗组(ESWT和绷带)或对照组(仅绷带)。在治疗组的肢体上,每个伤口用非聚焦型液电冲击波发生器发射的625个冲击波脉冲进行治疗。在对照组的肢体上,每个伤口接受假治疗。每周记录伤口外观,分为发炎或健康,并对突出的肉芽组织量进行评分。使用标准化数码照片确定新生上皮化面积和绝对伤口面积。连续6周,每周对每个肢体上的1个伤口进行活检,以评估上皮化、纤维增生、新生血管形成和炎症情况。使用抗平滑肌肌动蛋白免疫组织化学染色标记肌成纤维细胞。
与治疗组伤口相比,对照组伤口发炎的可能性高1.9倍。对照组伤口的肉芽组织过度增生评分显著更高。治疗对伤口大小或新生上皮化面积没有影响。两组之间在任何组织学或免疫组织化学变量上均未发现显著差异。
ESWT治疗并未加速马远端肢体伤口的愈合,但治疗组伤口的肉芽组织增生较少,外观比对照组更健康。因此,ESWT可能有助于预防此类伤口的肉芽组织过度增生和慢性炎症,但在推荐ESWT用于临床应用之前,还需要进一步研究。