• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

准备原始临床数据供发表:期刊编辑、作者和同行评审者指南。

Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers.

机构信息

BioMed Central, 236 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8HL, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2010 Jan 29;11:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-9.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-11-9
PMID:20113465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2825513/
Abstract

In recognition of the benefits of transparent reporting, many peer-reviewed journals require that their authors be prepared to share their raw, unprocessed data with other scientists and/or state the availability of raw data in published articles. But little information on how data should be prepared for publication - or sharing - has emerged. In clinical research patient privacy and consent for use of personal health information are key considerations, but agreed-upon definitions of what constitutes anonymised patient information do not appear to have been established. We aim to address this issue by providing practical guidance for those involved in the publication process, by proposing a minimum standard for de-identifying datasets for the purposes of publication in a peer-reviewed biomedical journal, or sharing with other researchers. Basic advice on file preparation is provided along with procedural guidance on prospective and retrospective publication of raw data, with an emphasis on randomised controlled trials.

摘要

为了认识到透明报告的益处,许多经过同行评审的期刊要求作者准备好与其他科学家共享原始、未处理的数据,并在已发表的文章中说明原始数据的可用性。但是,关于如何准备数据以供发布或共享的信息很少。在临床研究中,患者隐私和同意使用个人健康信息是关键考虑因素,但似乎尚未就构成匿名患者信息的内容达成一致定义。我们旨在通过为参与出版过程的人员提供实用指导来解决这个问题,我们提议制定一个最低标准,用于将数据集去标识化,以便在同行评审的生物医学期刊上发表,或与其他研究人员共享。我们提供了有关文件准备的基本建议,以及关于前瞻性和回顾性发布原始数据的程序指南,重点是随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers.准备原始临床数据供发表:期刊编辑、作者和同行评审者指南。
Trials. 2010 Jan 29;11:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-9.
2
Towards agreement on best practice for publishing raw clinical trial data.就发布原始临床试验数据的最佳实践达成共识。
Trials. 2009 Mar 18;10:17. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-17.
3
Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal instructions to authors.随机试验中干预措施的报告:对期刊给作者的投稿指南的审核
Trials. 2014 Jan 14;15:20. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-20.
4
Privacy and confidentiality in the publication of pedigrees: a survey of investigators and biomedical journals.系谱发表中的隐私与保密:对研究者和生物医学期刊的一项调查
JAMA. 1998 Jun 10;279(22):1808-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.22.1808.
5
Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.医学期刊编辑对生物医学期刊同行评审员角色和任务的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 24;9(11):e033421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033421.
6
Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers.补充材料在生物医学期刊文章中的作用:对作者、审稿人和读者的调查
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 24;8(9):e021753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021753.
7
Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals.评估发表于高影响力心血管期刊的随机对照试验摘要的质量。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 May;12(5):e005260. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005260.
8
Medwave’s editorial history, policies and guidelines: 2. Editorial policies.Medwave的编辑历史、政策和指南:2. 编辑政策。
Medwave. 2017 Apr 3;17(3):e6909. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2017.03.6909.
9
Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.伊朗医学期刊编辑对医学研究发表的看法。
Saudi Med J. 2004 Jan;25(1 Suppl):S29-33.
10
The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.评估随机对照试验的同行评审员的最重要任务,与期刊编辑最常要求的任务并不一致。
BMC Med. 2015 Jul 3;13:158. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0395-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Weight gain leads to greater adverse metabolic responses in South Asian compared with white European men: the GlasVEGAS study.体重增加导致南亚男性比白种欧洲男性产生更大的代谢不良反应:格拉斯哥血管研究。
Nat Metab. 2024 Aug;6(8):1632-1645. doi: 10.1038/s42255-024-01101-z. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Introducing extended consultations for patients with severe mental illness in general practice: Results from the SOFIA feasibility study.在全科医学中为严重精神疾病患者提供扩展咨询:SOFIA 可行性研究结果。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Oct 5;24(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02152-z.
3
Ethical and Information Governance Considerations for Promoting Digital Social Interventions in Primary Care.在初级保健中推广数字社会干预措施的伦理与信息治理考量
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 27;25:e44886. doi: 10.2196/44886.
4
Report of the Medical Image De-Identification (MIDI) Task Group -- Best Practices and Recommendations.医学图像去识别化(MIDI)任务组报告——最佳实践与建议
ArXiv. 2025 Mar 16:arXiv:2303.10473v3.
5
Current recommendations/practices for anonymising data from clinical trials in order to make it available for sharing: A scoping review.当前为了使临床试验数据可供共享而对其进行匿名化的建议/实践:范围综述。
Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;19(4):452-463. doi: 10.1177/17407745221087469. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Writing up your clinical trial report for a scientific journal: the REPORT trial guide for effective and transparent research reporting without spin.为科学期刊撰写临床试验报告:REPORT试验指南,用于有效且透明的无夸大研究报告。
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Jun;56(12):683-691. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105058. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
7
Advancing trauma care through social media.通过社交媒体推进创伤护理。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Jul 21;6(1):e000798. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000798. eCollection 2021.
8
A dataset of daily ambulatory psychological and physiological recording for emotion research.日常动态心理和生理记录数据集,用于情绪研究。
Sci Data. 2021 Jun 28;8(1):161. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00945-4.
9
PRIME-IPD SERIES Part 1. The PRIME-IPD tool promoted verification and standardization of study datasets retrieved for IPD meta-analysis.PRIME-IPD 系列第 1 部分。PRIME-IPD 工具促进了为 IPD 荟萃分析检索的研究数据集的验证和标准化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 24.
10
Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR-IB criteria.OSCAR-IB 标准的人工智能扩展。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021 Jul;8(7):1528-1542. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51320. Epub 2021 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Sharing the raw data from medical research [corrected].分享医学研究的原始数据[已修正]。
BMJ. 2009 Mar 25;338:b1252. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1252.
2
Towards agreement on best practice for publishing raw clinical trial data.就发布原始临床试验数据的最佳实践达成共识。
Trials. 2009 Mar 18;10:17. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-17.
3
Reproducible research: moving toward research the public can really trust.可重复性研究:迈向公众真正能信任的研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 20;146(6):450-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-6-200703200-00154. Epub 2007 Mar 5.
4
Patient safety requires a new way to publish clinical trials.患者安全需要一种新的临床试验发布方式。
PLoS Clin Trials. 2006 May;1(1):e6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010006.
5
Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials.这到底是谁的数据集?分享随机试验的原始数据。
Trials. 2006 May 16;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-15.
6
Publishing raw data and real time statistical analysis on e-journals.在电子期刊上发布原始数据和实时统计分析。
BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.530.
7
Making original data from clinical studies available for alternative analysis.使临床研究的原始数据可用于其他分析。
J Rheumatol. 1997 May;24(5):822-5.