Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Feb;20(2):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.016. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
Recurrent miscarriage (RM) is a multifactorial clinical problem. Guidelines have been published to guide evidence-based clinical practice in RM. To measure adherence to these guidelines in daily practice and to monitor quality of care delivered in RM patients, indicators are necessary. This study aimed to develop a set of valid quality indicators for RM and to explore the relationship between evidence level of guideline recommendations and their acceptance rate as quality indicators. Expert opinions of 11 gynaecologists were used to appraise all guideline recommendations. The systematic RAND-modified Delphi method was used to develop the indicator set from the Dutch guideline on RM. The acceptance rate as indicator of the initial recommendations was assessed per evidence level. A representative set of 23 key recommendations was selected out of 39 guideline recommendations, covering diagnostic tests, lifestyle, therapy and counselling. All recommendations of evidence level A (high) and D (consensus based) were accepted as indicators, while 64% of level B and 22% of level C was accepted. In conclusion, this study generated a set of 23 quality indicators for care in couples with RM. The selection of all consensus-based recommendations subscribes the general importance of these recommendations for gynaecologists.
复发性流产(RM)是一种多因素的临床问题。已经发布了指南,以指导 RM 的基于证据的临床实践。为了衡量在日常实践中对这些指南的遵守情况,并监测 RM 患者提供的护理质量,需要指标。本研究旨在为 RM 制定一套有效的质量指标,并探讨指南建议的证据水平与作为质量指标的接受率之间的关系。11 位妇科医生的专家意见用于评估所有指南建议。采用系统的 RAND 改良 Delphi 方法,从荷兰 RM 指南中制定指标集。根据证据水平评估初始建议作为指标的接受率。从 39 条指南建议中选择了 23 条具有代表性的关键建议,涵盖了诊断测试、生活方式、治疗和咨询。所有证据水平为 A(高)和 D(基于共识)的建议均被接受为指标,而 B 级的 64%和 C 级的 22%被接受。总之,本研究为 RM 患者的护理制定了一套 23 项质量指标。所有基于共识的建议的选择都表明这些建议对妇科医生的重要性。