Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3X9 Canada.
Environ Pollut. 2010 May;158(5):1182-4. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
Stable isotopes of carbon (delta(13)C) and nitrogen (delta(15)N) are used frequently in ecotoxicological investigations of birds to relate contaminant levels to trophic position (delta(15)N) or foraging location (delta(13)C) and many researchers using avian feathers in such investigations use delta(13)C or delta(15)N as a predictor of contaminant concentrations. Contaminants, especially mercury, however, are integrated into feathers over different time periods than are stable isotopes, resulting in spurious relationships that have no biological meaning. I show the fundamental principles behind the conclusion that relating delta(13)C or delta(15)N to contaminant concentrations in feathers is not appropriate in light of the number of recent studies that have employed this approach, and make recommendations for those wishing to investigate the relationship between contaminants and stable isotope ratios.
碳(δ(13)C)和氮(δ(15)N)的稳定同位素经常被用于鸟类的生态毒理学研究中,以将污染物水平与营养位(δ(15)N)或觅食地点(δ(13)C)联系起来,许多研究人员在这类研究中使用鸟类羽毛,并将 δ(13)C 或 δ(15)N 作为污染物浓度的预测因子。然而,污染物,尤其是汞,在羽毛中的积累时间与稳定同位素不同,这导致了没有生物学意义的虚假关系。我展示了在考虑到最近许多采用这种方法的研究之后,得出将 δ(13)C 或 δ(15)N 与羽毛中的污染物浓度联系起来是不合适的结论的基本原则,并为那些希望研究污染物与稳定同位素比值之间关系的人提出了建议。