Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):235-50. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.016. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
Recent studies show that when words are correlated with the colours they are printed in (e.g., MOVE is presented 75% of the time in blue), colour identification is faster when the word is presented in its correlated colour (MOVE in blue) than in an uncorrelated colour (MOVE in green). The present series of experiments explored the possible mechanisms involved in this colour-word contingency learning effect. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the effect is already present after 18 learning trials. During subsequent unlearning, the effect extinguished equally rapidly. Two reanalyses of data from Schmidt, Crump, Cheesman, and Besner (2007) ruled out an account of the effect in terms of stimulus repetitions. Experiment 2 demonstrated that participants who carry a memory load do not show a contingency effect, supporting the hypothesis that limited-capacity resources are required for learning. Experiment 3 demonstrated that memory resources are required for both storage and retrieval processes.
最近的研究表明,当单词与它们的印刷颜色相关联时(例如,单词 MOVE 有 75%的时间以蓝色呈现),当单词以相关颜色(蓝色的 MOVE)呈现时,比以不相关颜色(绿色的 MOVE)呈现时,颜色识别更快。本系列实验探讨了这种颜色-单词关联学习效应所涉及的可能机制。实验 1 表明,在 18 次学习试验后,这种效应已经存在。在随后的去学习过程中,这种效应同样迅速消失。对 Schmidt、Crump、Cheesman 和 Besner(2007)的数据进行的两次重新分析排除了这种效应是基于刺激重复的说法。实验 2 表明,携带记忆负荷的参与者没有表现出关联效应,这支持了这样一种假设,即学习需要有限的容量资源。实验 3 表明,记忆资源既需要用于存储过程,也需要用于检索过程。