• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一链贯穿万物。

One Link to Link Them All.

作者信息

Arunkumar Mrudula, Rothermund Klaus, Giesen Carina G

机构信息

Department of General Psychology II, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Health and Medical University Erfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2024 Jan 30;70(5):259-70. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000597.

DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000597
PMID:38288913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10918695/
Abstract

A conditioned response to a stimulus can be transferred to an associated stimulus, as seen in sensory preconditioning. In this research paper, we aimed to explore this phenomenon using a stimulus-response contingency learning paradigm using voluntary actions as responses. We conducted two preregistered experiments that explored whether a learned response can be indirectly activated by a stimulus (S1) that was never directly paired with the response itself. Importantly, S1 was previously associated with another stimulus (S2) that was then directly and contingently paired with a response (S2-R contingency). In Experiment 1a, an indirect activation of acquired stimulus-response contingencies was present for audiovisual stimulus pairs wherein the stimulus association resembled a vocabulary learning setup. This result was replicated in Experiment 1b. Additionally, we found that the effect is moderated by having conscious awareness of the S1-S2 association and the S2-R contingency. By demonstrating indirect activation effects for voluntary actions, our findings show that principles of Pavlovian conditioning like sensory preconditioning also apply to contingency learning of stimulus-response relations for operant behavior.

摘要

对一种刺激的条件反应可以转移到相关联的刺激上,如在感觉预条件作用中所见。在本研究论文中,我们旨在使用以自主行为作为反应的刺激-反应偶联学习范式来探究这一现象。我们进行了两项预先注册的实验,探究一种习得反应是否能被一个从未与该反应本身直接配对的刺激(S1)间接激活。重要的是,S1先前与另一个刺激(S2)相关联,然后该刺激与一种反应直接且偶联配对(S2-R偶联)。在实验1a中,对于视听刺激对存在习得的刺激-反应偶联的间接激活,其中刺激关联类似于词汇学习设置。该结果在实验1b中得到重复。此外,我们发现这种效应受到对S1-S2关联和S2-R偶联的有意识觉知的调节。通过展示自主行为的间接激活效应,我们的研究结果表明,像感觉预条件作用这样的经典条件作用原理也适用于操作性行为的刺激-反应关系的偶联学习。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd70/10918695/56c6ceec97a1/zea_70_5_259_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd70/10918695/c9405cc86cc8/zea_70_5_259_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd70/10918695/abfc9ca9d8d1/zea_70_5_259_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd70/10918695/56c6ceec97a1/zea_70_5_259_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd70/10918695/c9405cc86cc8/zea_70_5_259_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd70/10918695/abfc9ca9d8d1/zea_70_5_259_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd70/10918695/56c6ceec97a1/zea_70_5_259_fig3a.jpg

相似文献

1
One Link to Link Them All.一链贯穿万物。
Exp Psychol. 2024 Jan 30;70(5):259-70. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000597.
2
Aspects of the reinforcer learned in second-order Pavlovian conditioning.在二级巴甫洛夫条件反射中习得的强化物的各个方面。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1979 Jan;5(1):79-95. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.5.1.79.
3
Classical conditioning of autonomic fear responses is independent of contingency awareness.自主恐惧反应的经典条件作用与意外事件意识无关。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):495-500. doi: 10.1037/a0020263.
4
Element pretraining influences the content of appetitive serial compound conditioning in rats.元素预训练会影响大鼠中有食欲的系列复合条件反射的内容。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985 Jul;11(3):367-87.
5
Dopamine D1 and D2 Receptors Are Important for Learning About Neutral-Valence Relationships in Sensory Preconditioning.多巴胺D1和D2受体对于在感觉预适应中了解中性效价关系很重要。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug 30;15:740992. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.740992. eCollection 2021.
6
Associative processes in differentially reared monkeys (Macaca mulatta): sensory preconditioning.不同饲养条件下猕猴(恒河猴)的联想过程:感觉预适应
Dev Psychobiol. 1988 May;21(4):355-64. doi: 10.1002/dev.420210406.
7
Amount of training and stimulus salience affect associability changes in serial conditioning.
Behav Processes. 2002 Sep 30;59(3):169. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00092-x.
8
Appetitive and aversive sensory preconditioning in rats is impaired by disruption of the postrhinal cortex.大鼠的味觉和厌恶感觉条件反射前刺激被破坏后受损。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2021 Sep;183:107461. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107461. Epub 2021 May 17.
9
Spatial contiguity facilitates Pavlovian second-order conditioning.空间邻近性促进巴甫洛夫二阶条件作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1979 Apr;5(2):152-61. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.5.2.152.
10
I like it because I said that I like it: evaluative conditioning effects can be based on stimulus-response learning.我喜欢它是因为我这么说了:评价性条件作用效应可以基于刺激-反应学习。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Oct;37(4):466-76. doi: 10.1037/a0023077.

本文引用的文献

1
Accounting for Proportion Congruency Effects in the Stroop Task in a Confounded Setup: Retrieval of Stimulus-Response Episodes Explains it All.在混淆设置中考虑斯特鲁普任务中的比例一致性效应:刺激-反应情节的检索解释了一切。
J Cogn. 2022 Jun 29;5(1):39. doi: 10.5334/joc.232. eCollection 2022.
2
Being in the Know: The Role of Awareness and Retrieval of Transient Stimulus-Response Bindings in Selective Contingency Learning.了解情况:意识和瞬态刺激-反应绑定的检索在选择性偶然性学习中的作用。
J Cogn. 2022 Jun 9;5(1):36. doi: 10.5334/joc.227. eCollection 2022.
3
Proportion of conflict, contingency learning, and recency effects in a Stroop task.
在斯特鲁普任务中冲突、偶然学习和近因效应的比例。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Aug;75(8):1528-1540. doi: 10.1177/17470218211056813. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
4
Order among chaos: Cross-linguistic differences and developmental trajectories in pseudoword reading aloud using pronunciation Entropy.混沌中的有序:使用发音熵的默读假词的跨语言差异和发展轨迹。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251629. eCollection 2021.
5
Reliable Correlational Cuing While Controlling for Most-Recent-Pairing Effects.在控制最近配对效应的同时进行可靠的相关线索提示。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 16;11:592377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592377. eCollection 2020.
6
The Law of Recency: An Episodic Stimulus-Response Retrieval Account of Habit Acquisition.近因律:习惯习得的情景刺激-反应检索解释
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 15;10:2927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927. eCollection 2019.
7
Contingency learning as binding? Testing an exemplar view of the colour-word contingency learning effect.作为绑定的偶然性学习?检验颜色-单词偶然性学习效应的样例观点。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 May;73(5):739-761. doi: 10.1177/1747021820906397. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
8
How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables.在具备足够检验效能的实验中我们需要纳入多少参与者?一份带有参考表的检验效能分析教程。
J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):16. doi: 10.5334/joc.72.
9
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
10
Dissociating decision strategies in free-choice tasks - A mouse tracking analysis.在自由选择任务中区分决策策略——一项鼠标追踪分析
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Oct;190:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jul 14.