Cranfield University, Centre for Resource Management and Efficiency, School of Applied Sciences, Bedfordshire, UK.
Waste Manag. 2010 Jul;30(7):1171-82. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.012. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
The carbon emissions trading market has created a need for standard methods for the determination of biogenic content (chi(B)) in solid recovered fuels (SRF). We compare the manual sorting (MSM) and selective dissolution methods (SDM), as amended by recent research, for a range of process streams from a mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) plant. The two methods provide statistically different biogenic content values, as expressed on a dry mass basis, uncorrected for ash content. However, they correlate well (r(2)>0.9) and the relative difference between them was <5% for chi(B) between 21% (w)/w(d) and 72% (w)/w(d) (uncorrected for ash content). This range includes the average SRF biogenic content of ca. 68% (w)/w(d). Methodological improvements are discussed in light of recent studies. The repeatability of the SDM is characterised by relative standard deviations on triplicates of <2.5% for the studied population.
碳排放交易市场对固体回收燃料 (SRF) 中生物含量 (chi(B)) 的测定需要标准化方法。我们比较了修订后的手工分拣 (MSM) 和选择性溶解方法 (SDM),以机械-生物处理 (MBT) 厂的一系列工艺流为例。这两种方法以干质量为基础,未校正灰分,提供了统计上不同的生物含量值。然而,它们相关性很好(r(2)>0.9),在未经灰分校正的情况下,它们之间的相对差异<5%,chi(B)在 21%(w)/w(d)到 72%(w)/w(d)之间(不包括灰分)。这一范围包括平均约 68%(w)/w(d)的 SRF 生物含量。根据最近的研究,讨论了方法上的改进。SDM 的重复性以研究人群中三个重复的相对标准偏差<2.5%为特征。