Suppr超能文献

机械-生物处理厂生产固体回收燃料的工艺流中的生物生成含量。手动分拣和选择性溶解测定方法是否相关?

The biogenic content of process streams from mechanical-biological treatment plants producing solid recovered fuel. Do the manual sorting and selective dissolution determination methods correlate?

机构信息

Cranfield University, Centre for Resource Management and Efficiency, School of Applied Sciences, Bedfordshire, UK.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2010 Jul;30(7):1171-82. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.012. Epub 2010 Feb 8.

Abstract

The carbon emissions trading market has created a need for standard methods for the determination of biogenic content (chi(B)) in solid recovered fuels (SRF). We compare the manual sorting (MSM) and selective dissolution methods (SDM), as amended by recent research, for a range of process streams from a mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) plant. The two methods provide statistically different biogenic content values, as expressed on a dry mass basis, uncorrected for ash content. However, they correlate well (r(2)>0.9) and the relative difference between them was <5% for chi(B) between 21% (w)/w(d) and 72% (w)/w(d) (uncorrected for ash content). This range includes the average SRF biogenic content of ca. 68% (w)/w(d). Methodological improvements are discussed in light of recent studies. The repeatability of the SDM is characterised by relative standard deviations on triplicates of <2.5% for the studied population.

摘要

碳排放交易市场对固体回收燃料 (SRF) 中生物含量 (chi(B)) 的测定需要标准化方法。我们比较了修订后的手工分拣 (MSM) 和选择性溶解方法 (SDM),以机械-生物处理 (MBT) 厂的一系列工艺流为例。这两种方法以干质量为基础,未校正灰分,提供了统计上不同的生物含量值。然而,它们相关性很好(r(2)>0.9),在未经灰分校正的情况下,它们之间的相对差异<5%,chi(B)在 21%(w)/w(d)到 72%(w)/w(d)之间(不包括灰分)。这一范围包括平均约 68%(w)/w(d)的 SRF 生物含量。根据最近的研究,讨论了方法上的改进。SDM 的重复性以研究人群中三个重复的相对标准偏差<2.5%为特征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验