Suppr超能文献

伸肌腱修复方法的生物力学研究:连续交锁水平褥式伸肌腱修复技术介绍

A biomechanical study of extensor tendon repair methods: introduction to the running-interlocking horizontal mattress extensor tendon repair technique.

作者信息

Lee Steve K, Dubey Ashok, Kim Byung H, Zingman Alissa, Landa Josh, Paksima Nader

机构信息

Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jan;35(1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.09.011.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Extensor tendon injuries are common; however, relatively few studies have evaluated extensor tendon repair methods. The purpose of this study was to investigate the properties of the running-interlocking horizontal mattress repair method with regard to tendon shortening, stiffness, strength, and time needed to perform the repair, compared with the modified Bunnell method and the augmented Becker method.

METHODS

Twenty-four extensor tendons from 8 fresh-frozen cadaveric hands were harvested from zone 6. The harvested tendons were randomly assigned into 1 of 3 repair groups: augmented Becker, modified Bunnell, and running-interlocking horizontal mattress repair methods. The running-interlocking horizontal mattress repair combines a running suture with an interlocking horizontal mattress suture. Each repaired tendon was measured for length before and after repair and tested for stiffness, ultimate load to failure, and time required to perform the repair.

RESULTS

The running-interlocking horizontal mattress repair was significantly stiffer (8,506 N/m) than the augmented Becker (5,971 N/m) and the modified Bunnell (6,719 N/m) repairs. The running-interlocking horizontal mattress repair resulted in significantly less shortening (1.7 mm) than the augmented Becker (6.2 mm) and modified Bunnell (6.3 mm) repairs. The running-interlocking horizontal mattress repair took significantly less time to perform without a significant difference in the ultimate load to failure (running-interlocking horizontal mattress repair, 51 N; augmented Becker, 53 N; modified Bunnell, 48 N).

CONCLUSIONS

The running-interlocking horizontal mattress repair is significantly stiffer and faster to perform than either the augmented Becker or the modified Bunnell repairs, and it results in less shortening than either of these methods. The running-interlocking horizontal mattress repair should be strong enough to withstand some early motion.

摘要

目的

伸肌腱损伤很常见;然而,评估伸肌腱修复方法的研究相对较少。本研究的目的是与改良Bunnell法和改良Becker法相比,研究连续锁边水平褥式缝合法在肌腱缩短、刚度、强度及修复所需时间方面的特性。

方法

从8只新鲜冷冻尸体手的6区获取24条伸肌腱。将获取的肌腱随机分为3个修复组中的1组:改良Becker法、改良Bunnell法和连续锁边水平褥式缝合法。连续锁边水平褥式缝合法将连续缝合与锁边水平褥式缝合相结合。测量每条修复肌腱修复前后的长度,并测试其刚度、极限破坏载荷及修复所需时间。

结果

连续锁边水平褥式缝合法的刚度(8506N/m)显著高于改良Becker法(5971N/m)和改良Bunnell法(6719N/m)。连续锁边水平褥式缝合法导致的肌腱缩短(1.7mm)显著少于改良Becker法(6.2mm)和改良Bunnell法(6.3mm)。连续锁边水平褥式缝合法的修复时间显著更短,而极限破坏载荷无显著差异(连续锁边水平褥式缝合法为51N;改良Becker法为53N;改良Bunnell法为48N)。

结论

连续锁边水平褥式缝合法的刚度显著高于改良Becker法或改良Bunnell法,且修复速度更快,导致的肌腱缩短也少于这两种方法。连续锁边水平褥式缝合法应足够牢固,能够承受早期的一些活动。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验