Suppr超能文献

重新评估 Premier 艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B 免疫测定法,并与谷氨酸脱氢酶共同抗原检测进行比较,评估 Bartels 细胞毒素和 Prodesse ProGastro Cd 聚合酶链反应作为确认程序。

Reevaluation of the Premier Clostridium difficile toxin A and B immunoassay with comparison to glutamate dehydrogenase common antigen testing evaluating Bartels cytotoxin and Prodesse ProGastro Cd polymerase chain reaction as confirmatory procedures.

机构信息

Affiliated Laboratory, Inc., Bangor, ME 04401, USA.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;66(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.09.001.

Abstract

Enzyme immunoassays are currently the most common tests used in the clinical laboratory for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins; however, significant problems with their performance have recently been described. We prospectively reevaluated the Meridian Premier C. difficile toxin A/B assay with direct comparison to a 2-step algorithm that screened for C. difficile common antigen and compared cytotoxin and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as confirmatory procedures. The Premier assay lacked sufficient sensitivity, missing 25% of true-positive samples. PCR was the most sensitive method and the only procedure that allowed same day testing and reporting.

摘要

酶免疫分析是目前临床实验室检测艰难梭菌毒素最常用的方法;然而,最近描述了其性能存在重大问题。我们前瞻性地重新评估了 Meridian Premier C. difficile 毒素 A/B 检测法,与两步法进行了直接比较,两步法筛选艰难梭菌共同抗原,并将细胞毒素和实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)作为确认程序进行了比较。Premier 检测法灵敏度不足,漏检了 25%的真阳性样本。PCR 是最敏感的方法,也是唯一能够在同一天进行检测和报告的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验