Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2014 Feb;47(1):75-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
The analytical performance and cost-effectiveness of the Wampole Toxin A/B EIA, the C. Diff. Quik Chek Complete (CdQCC) (a combined glutamate dehydrogenase antigen/toxin enzyme immunoassay), two RT-PCR assays (Progastro Cd and BD GeneOhm) and a modified two-step algorithm using the CdQCC reflexed to RT-PCR for indeterminate results were compared. The sensitivity of the Wampole Toxin A/B EIA, CdQCC (GDH antigen), BD GeneOhm and Progastro Cd RT-PCR were 85.4%, 95.8%, 100% and 93.8%, respectively. The algorithm provided rapid results for 86% of specimens and the remaining indeterminate results were resolved by RT-PCR, offering the best balance of sensitivity and cost savings per test (algorithm ∼US$13.50/test versus upfront RT-PCR ∼US$26.00/test).
我们比较了 Wampole 毒素 A/B EIA、C. Diff. Quik Chek Complete(CdQCC)(一种联合谷氨酸脱氢酶抗原/毒素酶免疫测定法)、两种 RT-PCR 检测法(Progastro Cd 和 BD GeneOhm),以及使用 CdQCC 进行 RT-PCR 检测以解决不确定结果的改良两步算法的分析性能和成本效益。Wampole 毒素 A/B EIA、CdQCC(GDH 抗原)、BD GeneOhm 和 Progastro Cd RT-PCR 的灵敏度分别为 85.4%、95.8%、100%和 93.8%。该算法可快速提供 86%标本的结果,其余不确定结果通过 RT-PCR 解决,每个检测的灵敏度和成本节约达到最佳平衡(算法约为 13.50 美元/检测,而直接进行 RT-PCR 检测约为 26.00 美元/检测)。