National Center for Health Marketing, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):217-29. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.005.
A systematic review of the literature to assess the effectiveness of alcohol tax policy interventions for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms was conducted for the Guide to Community Preventive Services (Community Guide). Seventy-two papers or technical reports, which were published prior to July 2005, met specified quality criteria, and included evaluation outcomes relevant to public health (e.g., binge drinking, alcohol-related crash fatalities), were included in the final review. Nearly all studies, including those with different study designs, found that there was an inverse relationship between the tax or price of alcohol and indices of excessive drinking or alcohol-related health outcomes. Among studies restricted to underage populations, most found that increased taxes were also significantly associated with reduced consumption and alcohol-related harms. According to Community Guide rules of evidence, these results constitute strong evidence that raising alcohol excise taxes is an effective strategy for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. The impact of a potential tax increase is expected to be proportional to its magnitude and to be modified by such factors as disposable income and the demand elasticity for alcohol among various population groups.
为《社区预防服务指南》(社区指南)进行了系统的文献综述,以评估酒精税收政策干预措施在减少过度饮酒和相关危害方面的有效性。72 篇论文或技术报告符合特定的质量标准,其中包括与公共卫生相关的评估结果(例如,狂饮、与酒精相关的致命事故),最终审查中包含了这些内容。几乎所有的研究,包括那些采用不同研究设计的研究,都发现酒精税或价格与过度饮酒或与酒精相关的健康结果指数之间存在反比关系。在仅限于未成年人群体的研究中,大多数发现提高税收也与消费减少和与酒精相关的危害显著相关。根据社区指南的证据规则,这些结果构成了强有力的证据,表明提高酒精消费税是减少过度饮酒和相关危害的有效策略。潜在税收增加的影响预计与其幅度成正比,并受到可支配收入和不同人群群体对酒精的需求弹性等因素的影响。