Marionneau Virve, Matteucci Nicola, Vieira Lima Sabrina, Nikkinen Janne, Selin Jani
Centre for Research on Addiction, Control, and Governance, Faculty of Social Sciences. Unioninkatu 33, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
DiSES, Marche Polytechnic University, P.le Martelli, 8, 60121, Ancona, Italy.
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jan 3;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01145-0.
Taxation can be used to direct consumption and provision of harmful commodities. Prior research on gambling taxation has nevertheless been inconclusive on whether this can also apply to gambling. In gambling policy, optimal taxation rates have particularly been debated from the perspective of channelling consumption from offshore markets to regulated markets. Prior industry-sponsored reports have suggested that lower tax rates may be correlated with higher channelling rates.
We analyse data on two cross-sections (2018; 2021) derived from 29 European countries. The data consist of estimated channelling rates, information on taxation levels, and controls including blocking policies. We produce a descriptive overview of the recent evolution of market channelling and taxation for online gambling products across Europe. We also produce a multivariate regression analysis on the extent that market channelling is correlated with taxation of online gambling.
Our results show important divergence in taxation of online gambling markets in Europe. We also found that over time, the market share of offshore markets has declined in relative terms. However, this decline is explained by a more rapid growth in the regulated market in absolute terms. The regression analysis found no evidence of a negative correlation between that taxation rates and channelling rates within Europe.
Gambling policy needs to be based on empirical, impartial evidence. Misleading estimates may result in increased harms to societies. Channelling objectives are important for better regulation and harm reduction, but taxation levels do not appear to be correlated to the success of channelling policies.
税收可用于引导有害商品的消费和供应。然而,先前关于赌博税的研究对于其是否也适用于赌博尚无定论。在赌博政策方面,从将消费从离岸市场引导至受监管市场的角度,最优税率一直备受争议。先前行业赞助的报告表明,较低的税率可能与较高的引导率相关。
我们分析了来自29个欧洲国家的两个横截面(2018年;2021年)的数据。数据包括估计的引导率、税收水平信息以及包括封锁政策在内的控制变量。我们对欧洲在线赌博产品的市场引导和税收的近期演变进行了描述性概述。我们还对市场引导与在线赌博税收的相关性程度进行了多元回归分析。
我们的结果显示欧洲在线赌博市场的税收存在重大差异。我们还发现,随着时间的推移,离岸市场的市场份额相对下降。然而,这种下降是由受监管市场绝对增长更快所解释的。回归分析没有发现欧洲税率与引导率之间存在负相关的证据。
赌博政策需要基于实证、公正的证据。误导性的估计可能会给社会带来更多危害。引导目标对于更好的监管和减少危害很重要,但税收水平似乎与引导政策的成功与否无关。