Noel S H, Keene J S, Rice W L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wisconsin Clinical Sciences Center, Madison.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Feb;16(2):132-6.
This article compares the postoperative course of 40 patients who had Harrington instrumentation with 40 patients who had Harrington instrumentation and interspinous process segmental instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures and reviews the findings. The two groups of patients were otherwise homogeneous, and average operative time, total blood loss, and days to oral intake were similar for both groups of patients. On average, however, patients undergoing interspinous process segmental instrumentation were out of bed sooner (4.5 versus 7.7 days, P less than 0.0001), discharged sooner (32 versus 38 days, P less than 0.079), and brace-free earlier (2.1 versus 5.9 months, P less than 0.001) and had fewer fixation-related complications than did patients undergoing Harrington instrumentation alone. Comparison of average hospital costs documented a savings of $5,160 for the typical patient undergoing interspinous process segmental instrumentation.
本文比较了40例行哈灵顿器械固定术的患者与40例行哈灵顿器械固定术及不稳定胸腰椎骨折棘突间节段性器械固定术的患者的术后病程,并对结果进行了回顾。两组患者在其他方面均具有同质性,两组患者的平均手术时间、总失血量及开始经口进食天数相似。然而,平均而言,接受棘突间节段性器械固定术的患者更早下床(4.5天对7.7天,P<0.0001)、更早出院(32天对38天,P<0.079)、更早无需支具(2.1个月对5.9个月,P<0.001),且与单纯接受哈灵顿器械固定术的患者相比,固定相关并发症更少。平均住院费用比较显示,接受棘突间节段性器械固定术的典型患者节省了5160美元。