UMDNJ School of Nursing, Stratford, NJ 07107-3001, USA.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2010 Feb;24(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
This article examines the use of physical restraints through the four broad principles of ethics common to all helping professions. It asks whether the continued use of physical restraints is consistent with ethical practice through the lens of those principles. It also examines where the necessity to use restraints in the absence of empirically supported alternatives leaves professionals in terms of conflicts between ethical principles and makes recommendations for changes in education and clinical practice. It concludes that an analysis through a bioethics lens demonstrates that the use of restraints as a tool in psychiatric settings is a complex and multifaceted problem. Principles of ethics may often be in conflict with each other in instances where patients must be physically restrained.
本文通过所有助人职业都遵循的四项广泛的道德原则来考察身体约束的使用。它通过这些原则来询问在缺乏经验支持的替代方法的情况下继续使用身体约束是否符合道德实践。它还研究了在伦理原则发生冲突的情况下,专业人员在必须使用约束的情况下所处的困境,并就教育和临床实践的变革提出了建议。本文得出的结论是,通过生物伦理学视角进行分析表明,在必须对患者进行身体约束的情况下,将约束作为精神科环境中的一种工具使用是一个复杂而多方面的问题。在患者必须进行身体约束的情况下,伦理原则往往相互冲突。