Suppr超能文献

胎儿生长受限的胎盘病因:临床与病理差异。

Placental aetiologies of foetal growth restriction: clinical and pathological differences.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Centre, 59 Tchernihovski St., Kfar Saba 44281, Israel.

出版信息

Early Hum Dev. 2010 Jan;86(1):59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.01.020. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Placental morphology and pregnancy outcome differ between normal pregnancies and those with foetal growth restriction (FGR). Most reports do not differentiate among different placental injury patterns related to foetal growth restriction.

AIMS

To evaluate placental and perinatal findings in growth restricted pregnancies based on three placental injury patterns: maternal and foetal blood supply abnormalities, and villitis of unknown aetiology, compared to those of preeclampsia (PE) and normal pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SUBJECTS

65 growth restricted newborns and their placentas.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Comparison of the clinical perinatal characteristics and outcomes, placental pathology and the number of syncytiocapillary membranes in the terminal villi, of the 65 FGR cases with 13 pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia (PE), and 25 uncomplicated pregnancies as controls, at 34-40weeks gestation.

RESULTS

The most common injury patterns of FGR placentas were maternal underperfusion (66%) (group 1), foetal blood supply abnormality (17%) (group 2), and villitis of unknown aetiology (17%) (group 3). The rate of induced labours was the highest in group 1 but the rate of operative deliveries due to suspected foetal asphyxia was the highest in group 2 (p<0.05). In the FGR cases, inverse relationship was found between birth weight and the number of syncytiocapillary membranes (r=-0.31, p<.05) in the maternal underperfusion FGR cases (group 1) only.

CONCLUSIONS

The different injury patterns in placentas of FGR patients may be correlated to different clinical outcomes. Placental examination in FGR pregnancies can provide a specific pathophysiologic explanation that may recur in subsequent pregnancies and lead to changes in follow-up and management.

摘要

背景

正常妊娠和胎儿生长受限(FGR)的胎盘形态和妊娠结局不同。大多数报告没有区分与胎儿生长受限相关的不同胎盘损伤模式。

目的

根据三种胎盘损伤模式(母体和胎儿血液供应异常以及原因不明的绒毛膜炎)评估生长受限妊娠中的胎盘和围产儿发现,并与子痫前期(PE)和正常妊娠进行比较。

研究设计

回顾性研究。

受试者

65 例生长受限新生儿及其胎盘。

结果测量

比较 65 例 FGR 病例(伴发 13 例子痫前期(PE))和 25 例无并发症妊娠(对照组)的临床围产儿特征和结局、胎盘病理学和终末绒毛的合体滋养层膜数量,这些病例均在 34-40 周妊娠。

结果

FGR 胎盘最常见的损伤模式是母体灌注不足(66%)(第 1 组)、胎儿血液供应异常(17%)(第 2 组)和原因不明的绒毛膜炎(17%)(第 3 组)。第 1 组的诱导分娩率最高,但由于疑似胎儿窒息而行剖宫产率最高的是第 2 组(p<0.05)。在 FGR 病例中,仅在母体灌注不足的 FGR 病例(第 1 组)中发现出生体重与合体滋养层膜数量呈负相关(r=-0.31,p<.05)。

结论

FGR 患者的不同胎盘损伤模式可能与不同的临床结局相关。FGR 妊娠中的胎盘检查可以提供可能在后续妊娠中再次出现的特定病理生理解释,并导致随访和管理的变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验