使用手机进行身体活动的测量:采用标准方法进行验证。

Measures of physical activity using cell phones: validation using criterion methods.

作者信息

Bexelius Christin, Löf Marie, Sandin Sven, Trolle Lagerros Ylva, Forsum Elisabet, Litton Jan-Eric

机构信息

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2010 Jan 29;12(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1298.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical activity is associated with reduced risks of many chronic diseases. Data collected on physical activity in large epidemiological studies is often based on paper questionnaires. The validity of these questionnaires is debated, and more effective methods are needed.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates repeated measures of physical activity level (PAL) and the feasibility of using a Java-based questionnaire downloaded onto cell phones for collection of such data. The data obtained were compared with reference estimates based on the doubly labeled water method and indirect calorimetry (PAL(ref)).

METHOD

Using a Java-based cell phone application, 22 women reported their physical activity based on two short questions answered daily over a 14-day period (PAL(cell)). Results were compared with reference data obtained from the doubly labeled water method and indirect calorimetry (PAL(ref)). Results were also compared against physical activity levels assessed by two regular paper questionnaires completed by women at the end of the 14-day period (PAL(quest1) and PAL(quest2)). PAL(cell), PAL(quest1), and PAL(quest2) were compared with PAL(ref) using the Bland and Altman procedure.

RESULTS

The mean difference between PAL(cell) and PAL(ref) was small (0.014) with narrow limits of agreement (2SD = 0.30). Compared with PAL(ref), the mean difference was also small for PAL(quest1) and PAL(quest2) (0.004 and 0.07, respectively); however, the limits of agreement were wider (PAL(quest1), 2SD = 0.50 and PAL(quest2), 2SD = 0.90). The test for trend was statistically significant for PAL(quest1) (slope of regression line = 0.79, P = .04) as well as for PAL(quest2) (slope of regression line = 1.58, P < .001) when compared with PAL(ref).

CONCLUSION

A Java-based physical activity questionnaire administered daily using cell phones produced PAL estimates that agreed well with PAL reference values. Furthermore, the limits of agreement between PAL obtained using cell phones, and reference values were narrower than for corresponding estimates obtained using paper questionnaires. Java-based questionnaires downloaded onto cell phones may be a feasible and cost-effective method of data collection for large-scale prospective studies of physical activity.

摘要

背景

身体活动与多种慢性疾病风险的降低相关。大型流行病学研究中收集的身体活动数据通常基于纸质问卷。这些问卷的有效性存在争议,需要更有效的方法。

目的

本研究评估身体活动水平(PAL)的重复测量以及使用下载到手机上的基于Java的问卷收集此类数据的可行性。将获得的数据与基于双标水法和间接量热法的参考估计值(PAL(ref))进行比较。

方法

使用基于Java的手机应用程序,22名女性在14天内每天根据两个简短问题报告她们的身体活动情况(PAL(cell))。将结果与通过双标水法和间接量热法获得的参考数据(PAL(ref))进行比较。还将结果与女性在14天结束时填写的两份常规纸质问卷评估的身体活动水平(PAL(quest1)和PAL(quest2))进行比较。使用Bland和Altman方法将PAL(cell)、PAL(quest1)和PAL(quest2)与PAL(ref)进行比较。

结果

PAL(cell)与PAL(ref)之间的平均差异较小(0.014),一致性界限较窄(2SD = 0.30)。与PAL(ref)相比,PAL(quest1)和PAL(quest2)的平均差异也较小(分别为0.004和0.07);然而,一致性界限更宽(PAL(quest1),2SD = 0.50;PAL(quest2),2SD = 0.90)。与PAL(ref)相比时,PAL(quest1)的趋势检验具有统计学意义(回归线斜率 = 0.79,P = 0.04),PAL(quest2)的趋势检验也具有统计学意义(回归线斜率 = 1.58,P < 0.001)。

结论

每天使用手机管理的基于Java的身体活动问卷得出的PAL估计值与PAL参考值吻合良好。此外,使用手机获得的PAL与参考值之间的一致性界限比使用纸质问卷获得的相应估计值更窄。下载到手机上的基于Java的问卷可能是大规模身体活动前瞻性研究中一种可行且具有成本效益的数据收集方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2821583/5510a51d7bb9/jmir_v12i1e2_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索