Suppr超能文献

改良版 Baecke 问卷的有效性:与双标水法测定的能量消耗的比较。

Validity of the modified Baecke questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method.

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 May 27;5:30. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In epidemiological research, physical activity is usually assessed by questionnaires. Questionnaires are suitable for large study populations since they are relatively inexpensive and not very time consuming. However, questionnaire information is by definition subjective and prone to recall bias, especially among elderly subjects. The Modified Baecke Questionnaire, developed by Voorrips and coworkers, measures habitual physical activity in the elderly. The questionnaire includes questions on household activities, sports, and leisure time activities, over a time period of one year. The Modified Baecke Questionnaire results in a score to classify people as high, moderate, or low in daily physical activity, based on tertiles.

METHODS

The validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire score was assessed among 21 elderly men and women using the doubly labeled water method as the reference criterion. This method is considered to be the gold standard for measuring energy expenditure in free-living individuals. Energy expenditure on physical activity is estimated by the ratio of total energy expenditure measured by the doubly labeled water method and resting metabolic rate measured by indirect calorimetry. This ratio is called the physical activity ratio.

RESULTS

The Spearman correlation coefficient between the questionnaire score and the physical activity ratio (PAR) was 0.54 (95% CI 0.22-0.66). Correct classification by the questionnaire occurred in 71% of participants who were in the lowest tertile of PAR, in 14% of participants in the middle tertile, and in 43% of participants in the highest tertile. Subjects were not wrongly classified in an opposite tertile.

CONCLUSION

The validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire is fair-to-moderate. This study shows that the questionnaire can correctly classify individuals as low or high active, but does a poor job for moderately active individuals.

摘要

背景

在流行病学研究中,体力活动通常通过问卷进行评估。问卷适用于大的研究人群,因为它们相对便宜且不太耗时。然而,定义上问卷信息是主观的,容易受到回忆偏倚的影响,尤其是在老年受试者中。Voorrips 及其同事开发的改良 Baecke 问卷用于测量老年人的习惯性体力活动。该问卷包括一年内家庭活动、运动和休闲时间活动的问题。改良 Baecke 问卷根据 tertiles 将人们分为高、中、低日常体力活动水平。

方法

使用双标水法作为参考标准,评估了 21 名老年男性和女性的改良 Baecke 问卷评分的有效性。该方法被认为是测量自由生活个体能量消耗的金标准。通过双标水法测量的总能量消耗与间接测热法测量的静息代谢率的比值来估计体力活动的能量消耗。该比值称为体力活动比值。

结果

问卷评分与体力活动比值(PAR)之间的 Spearman 相关系数为 0.54(95%CI 0.22-0.66)。在 PAR 最低 tertile 的 71%参与者中,问卷正确分类;在中间 tertile 的 14%参与者中,在最高 tertile 的 43%参与者中。参与者没有被错误地分到相反的 tertile。

结论

改良 Baecke 问卷的效度为中等到适度。本研究表明,问卷可以正确地将个体分类为低活跃或高活跃,但对于中度活跃的个体则表现不佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaa0/2426713/df8858c9941d/1479-5868-5-30-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验