Suppr超能文献

股血管闭合装置和抗血栓治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者介入部位出血的影响:急性血管造影和紧急介入治疗分层策略(ACUITY)试验。

Impact of femoral vascular closure devices and antithrombotic therapy on access site bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial.

机构信息

Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Ill, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Feb 1;3(1):57-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.896704. Epub 2010 Jan 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial demonstrated that bivalirudin monotherapy significantly reduces major bleeding compared with heparin (unfractionated or enoxaparin) or bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in acute coronary syndromes. Whether vascular closure devices (VCD) impact these results is unknown. Therefore, this study sought to determine whether VCD impact major access site bleeding (ASB) in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early invasive management by the femoral approach.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Major ASB in ACUITY was defined as ASB requiring interventional or surgical correction, hematoma > or =5 cm at the access site, retroperitoneal bleeding, or hemoglobin drop > or =3 g/dL with ecchymosis or hematoma <5 cm, oozing blood, or prolonged bleeding (>30 minutes) at the access site. Stepwise logistical regression was performed to identify the independent determinants of ASB. Of 11 621 patients undergoing angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention by the femoral approach, 4307 (37.1%) received a VCD and 7314 (62.9%) did not. Rates of major ASB were lower with VCD compared with no VCD (2.5% versus 3.3%, relative risk, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.94; P=0.01) and were lowest in patients treated with bivalirudin monotherapy and a VCD (0.7%). Stepwise logistic regression revealed that a VCD (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.99; P=0.04) and bivalirudin monotherapy (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.49; P<0.0001) were both independent determinates of freedom from major ASB.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing an early invasive management strategy by the femoral approach, the use of a VCD, bivalirudin monotherapy, or both minimizes rates of major ASB. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00093158.

摘要

背景

急性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略(ACUITY)试验表明,与肝素(未分级或依诺肝素)或比伐卢定联合糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂相比,比伐卢定单药可显著减少急性冠脉综合征患者的主要出血。血管闭合装置(VCD)是否会影响这些结果尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在确定在接受经股动脉早期有创治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中,VCD 是否会影响主要入路部位出血(ASB)。

方法和结果

ACUITY 中的主要 ASB 定义为需要介入或手术矫正的 ASB、入路部位血肿>或=5cm、腹膜后出血或血红蛋白下降>或=3g/dL 伴瘀斑或血肿<5cm、渗血或出血时间延长(>30 分钟)。采用逐步逻辑回归分析确定 ASB 的独立决定因素。在 11621 例行冠状动脉造影术且经股动脉入路行或不行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,4307 例(37.1%)使用了 VCD,7314 例(62.9%)未使用。与未使用 VCD 相比,使用 VCD 后主要 ASB 发生率较低(2.5%比 3.3%,相对风险,0.76;95%CI,0.61 至 0.94;P=0.01),且在接受比伐卢定单药和 VCD 治疗的患者中最低(0.7%)。逐步逻辑回归显示,VCD(比值比,0.78;95%CI,0.61 至 0.99;P=0.04)和比伐卢定单药(比值比,0.35;95%CI,0.25 至 0.49;P<0.0001)均为主要 ASB 无发生的独立决定因素。

结论

在接受经股动脉早期有创治疗策略的急性冠脉综合征患者中,使用 VCD、比伐卢定单药或两者联合可最大限度地降低主要 ASB 发生率。临床试验注册- URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00093158。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验