Suppr超能文献

胸腔引流管拔除后超声检查与胸部X线摄影用于气胸检测的比较

Ultrasonography versus chest radiography after chest tube removal for the detection of pneumothorax.

作者信息

Saucier Sandra, Motyka Carrie, Killu Keith

机构信息

Eastern Michigan University, 206B Marshall Bldg, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, UAS.

出版信息

AACN Adv Crit Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;21(1):34-8. doi: 10.1097/NCI.0b013e3181c8013a.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bedside ultrasound technology is an innovative, cost-effective, safe, and reproducible method used to make efficient decisions that directly affect the care of critical care patients.

PURPOSE

To validate the use of ultrasound technology when compared with the use of standard chest radiography for the detection of pneumothorax following chest tube removal.

METHODS

A prospective observational comparison study of 50 cardiothoracic patients with surgically placed pleural chest tubes was conducted. The accuracy of bedside ultrasound technology was compared with standard chest radiography to detect pneumothorax.

RESULTS

The sample kappa statistic was 1.000, indicating a perfect agreement between bedside ultrasonography and chest radiography in the detection of pneumothorax. Completion of the bedside ultrasound procedure took significantly less time than chest radiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedside ultrasound technology is as accurate as chest radiography in detecting pneumothorax following chest tube removal and can save institutions' time and money.

摘要

背景

床旁超声技术是一种创新的、具有成本效益的、安全且可重复的方法,用于做出直接影响重症患者护理的高效决策。

目的

将超声技术与标准胸部X线摄影在胸腔闭式引流管拔除后气胸检测中的应用进行比较,以验证超声技术的有效性。

方法

对50例接受心胸外科手术并放置胸腔闭式引流管的患者进行前瞻性观察比较研究。将床旁超声技术与标准胸部X线摄影检测气胸的准确性进行比较。

结果

样本kappa统计值为1.000,表明床旁超声检查与胸部X线摄影在气胸检测方面完全一致。床旁超声检查程序的完成时间明显短于胸部X线摄影。

结论

床旁超声技术在胸腔闭式引流管拔除后检测气胸方面与胸部X线摄影一样准确,并且可以为医疗机构节省时间和金钱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验