Sacchi S, Marietta M, Vecchi A, Morselli S, Longo R, Grande A, Torelli U
Istituto di Clinica Medica, Università degli Studi di Modena, Italia.
Acta Haematol. 1991;85(1):6-11. doi: 10.1159/000204843.
The leukemic cells from 31 cases of acute myeloid leukemia were immunophenotyped by the alkaline phosphatase-antialkaline phosphatase (APAAP) technique, using 7 monoclonal antibodies reactive with cells of myeloid origin. We found a good correlation between the results obtained using the APAAP method and indirect immunofluorescence. In most cases, we observed a slight degree of variation in the percentages of reacting cells when comparing the two methods. Nevertheless, taking 20% of cells being immunolabeled as a threshold for defining a case as positive, we found no discrepancies in the final classification of each case. The main advantages of the APAAP method are: (1) its use with routinely prepared peripheral or blood marrow samples, and (2) the possibility of correlating immunological characterization with morphology. Since the results with the APAAP method were comparable with those obtained using indirect immunofluorescence, we suggest that this former technique can complement, and sometimes substitute, other methods of immunological evaluation.
采用碱性磷酸酶-抗碱性磷酸酶(APAAP)技术,使用7种与髓系来源细胞反应的单克隆抗体,对31例急性髓系白血病患者的白血病细胞进行免疫表型分析。我们发现使用APAAP方法获得的结果与间接免疫荧光法之间具有良好的相关性。在大多数情况下,比较这两种方法时,我们观察到反应细胞百分比存在轻微差异。然而,以20%的细胞被免疫标记作为定义病例为阳性的阈值,我们发现在每个病例的最终分类中没有差异。APAAP方法的主要优点是:(1)可用于常规制备的外周血或骨髓样本,(2)能够将免疫学特征与形态学相关联。由于APAAP方法的结果与间接免疫荧光法的结果相当,我们认为前一种技术可以补充,有时替代其他免疫学评估方法。