Suppr超能文献

在一个追踪刺激配对双反应格式中形成等价类:反应标签和先前程序传递性诱导的影响。

Equivalence class formation in a trace stimulus pairing two-response format: effects of response labels and prior programmed transitivity induction.

机构信息

Queens College of the City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jul;92(1):57-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-57.

Abstract

Three experiments identified factors that did and did not enhance the formation of two-node four-member equivalence classes when training and testing were conducted with trials presented in a trace stimulus pairing two-response (SP2R) format. All trials contained two separately presented stimuli. Half of the trials, called within-class trials, contained stimuli from the same class while the other half, called cross class trials, contained stimuli from different classes. On within class trials, making a YES response was correct and making a NO response was wrong. On cross class trials, making a NO response was correct and making a YES response was wrong. In Experiment 1, similar intermediate percentages of participants (about 50%) formed classes, regardless of whether the responses were labeled YES and NO or SAME and DIFF. Response labeling thus did not influence class formation. Regardless of response labels, failures of class formation were primarily due to failure of class-indicative responding produced by within-class transitivity probes. In Experiment 2, only 50% of participants formed classes without prior training, as in Experiment 1, but 100% of participants formed equivalence classes after the establishment of a generalized transitivity repertoire by use of a programmed transitivity induction protocol. Experiment 3 examined two components of the programmed transitivity induction protocol and found that the exclusion of AC trials had no effect on the percentage of participants who formed equivalence classes, while presenting the stimulus sets in randomized order interfered with equivalence class formation. A further analysis found that a number of stimulus control topographies differentiated between individuals who did and did not form equivalence classes. In general, then, these experiments demonstrate that equivalence classes can be formed reliably when training and testing are conducted in an SP2R format, supporting the view that equivalence class formation can account for the development of conceptual categories in natural settings.

摘要

三个实验确定了在训练和测试中使用痕迹刺激配对双反应 (SP2R) 格式呈现试验时,哪些因素增强了两节点四成员等价类的形成,哪些因素没有增强等价类的形成。所有试验都包含两个单独呈现的刺激。一半的试验,称为内类试验,包含来自同一类的刺激,而另一半,称为跨类试验,包含来自不同类的刺激。在内类试验中,YES 反应是正确的,NO 反应是错误的。在跨类试验中,NO 反应是正确的,YES 反应是错误的。在实验 1 中,无论响应是否标记为 YES 和 NO 或 SAME 和 DIFF,形成类的参与者的相似中间百分比(约 50%)是相同的。因此,响应标签不会影响类的形成。无论响应标签如何,类形成的失败主要是由于内类传递性探针产生的类指示性响应失败。在实验 2 中,与实验 1 一样,只有 50%的参与者没有经过预先训练就形成了类,但在使用程序化传递性诱导协议建立了广义传递性 repertoire 后,100%的参与者形成了等价类。实验 3 检验了程序化传递性诱导协议的两个组成部分,发现排除 AC 试验对形成等价类的参与者比例没有影响,而以随机顺序呈现刺激集则干扰了等价类的形成。进一步的分析发现,许多刺激控制拓扑结构区分了形成等价类的个体和未形成等价类的个体。总的来说,这些实验表明,当在 SP2R 格式中进行训练和测试时,可以可靠地形成等价类,支持等价类形成可以解释自然环境中概念类别发展的观点。

相似文献

2
Nodal structure and stimulus relatedness in equivalence classes: post-class formation preference tests.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 May;95(3):343-68. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-343.
3
Nodal structure and the partitioning of equivalence classes.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 May;89(3):359-81. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008-89-359.
4
Formation of new stimulus equivalence classes by exclusion.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Mar;109(2):380-393. doi: 10.1002/jeab.322. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
5
Transfer of baseline reject control to transitivity trials and its effect on equivalence class formation.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 May;111(3):465-478. doi: 10.1002/jeab.519. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
6
Equivalence class formation: a method for teaching statistical interactions.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):575-93. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-575.
9
Transfer of aversive respondent elicitation in accordance with equivalence relations.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jul;92(1):85-111. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-85.
10
Intraverbal naming and equivalence class formation in children.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Nov;104(3):223-40. doi: 10.1002/jeab.183.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational Simulation of Equivalence Class Formation Using the go/no-go Procedure with Compound Stimuli.
Psychol Rec. 2016;66:439-449. doi: 10.1007/s40732-016-0184-1. Epub 2016 May 19.
2
Transitive and anti-transitive emergent relations in pigeons: support for a theory of stimulus-class formation.
Behav Processes. 2015 Mar;112:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
3
Relational discrimination by pigeons in a go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli: a methodological note.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Nov;96(3):417-26. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-413.
4
Derived relational responding: a comparison of match-to-sample and the relational completion procedure.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Jul;94(1):37-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-37.

本文引用的文献

1
Second-order control of sequence-class equivalences in children.
Behav Processes. 1986 Sep;13(3):205-15. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(86)90084-7.
2
Understanding complex behavior: the transformation of stimulus functions.
Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;23(2):239-54. doi: 10.1007/BF03392013.
3
Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeons' equivalence-class formation.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):257-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-257.
4
Transformation of avoidance response functions in accordance with same and opposite relational frames.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Sep;88(2):249-62. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.22-07.
5
Equivalence relations, contextual control, and naming.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Nov;86(3):337-54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.82-05.
7
The structure of equivalence classes.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Sep;48(2):317-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-317.
8
Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):381-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-381.
9
Associative symmetry in the pigeon after successive matching-to-sample training.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Sep;84(2):147-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.115-04.
10
Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4(3):281-4. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-281.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验