Queens College of the City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jul;92(1):57-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-57.
Three experiments identified factors that did and did not enhance the formation of two-node four-member equivalence classes when training and testing were conducted with trials presented in a trace stimulus pairing two-response (SP2R) format. All trials contained two separately presented stimuli. Half of the trials, called within-class trials, contained stimuli from the same class while the other half, called cross class trials, contained stimuli from different classes. On within class trials, making a YES response was correct and making a NO response was wrong. On cross class trials, making a NO response was correct and making a YES response was wrong. In Experiment 1, similar intermediate percentages of participants (about 50%) formed classes, regardless of whether the responses were labeled YES and NO or SAME and DIFF. Response labeling thus did not influence class formation. Regardless of response labels, failures of class formation were primarily due to failure of class-indicative responding produced by within-class transitivity probes. In Experiment 2, only 50% of participants formed classes without prior training, as in Experiment 1, but 100% of participants formed equivalence classes after the establishment of a generalized transitivity repertoire by use of a programmed transitivity induction protocol. Experiment 3 examined two components of the programmed transitivity induction protocol and found that the exclusion of AC trials had no effect on the percentage of participants who formed equivalence classes, while presenting the stimulus sets in randomized order interfered with equivalence class formation. A further analysis found that a number of stimulus control topographies differentiated between individuals who did and did not form equivalence classes. In general, then, these experiments demonstrate that equivalence classes can be formed reliably when training and testing are conducted in an SP2R format, supporting the view that equivalence class formation can account for the development of conceptual categories in natural settings.
三个实验确定了在训练和测试中使用痕迹刺激配对双反应 (SP2R) 格式呈现试验时,哪些因素增强了两节点四成员等价类的形成,哪些因素没有增强等价类的形成。所有试验都包含两个单独呈现的刺激。一半的试验,称为内类试验,包含来自同一类的刺激,而另一半,称为跨类试验,包含来自不同类的刺激。在内类试验中,YES 反应是正确的,NO 反应是错误的。在跨类试验中,NO 反应是正确的,YES 反应是错误的。在实验 1 中,无论响应是否标记为 YES 和 NO 或 SAME 和 DIFF,形成类的参与者的相似中间百分比(约 50%)是相同的。因此,响应标签不会影响类的形成。无论响应标签如何,类形成的失败主要是由于内类传递性探针产生的类指示性响应失败。在实验 2 中,与实验 1 一样,只有 50%的参与者没有经过预先训练就形成了类,但在使用程序化传递性诱导协议建立了广义传递性 repertoire 后,100%的参与者形成了等价类。实验 3 检验了程序化传递性诱导协议的两个组成部分,发现排除 AC 试验对形成等价类的参与者比例没有影响,而以随机顺序呈现刺激集则干扰了等价类的形成。进一步的分析发现,许多刺激控制拓扑结构区分了形成等价类的个体和未形成等价类的个体。总的来说,这些实验表明,当在 SP2R 格式中进行训练和测试时,可以可靠地形成等价类,支持等价类形成可以解释自然环境中概念类别发展的观点。