Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎患者对利妥昔单抗的反应和复发时间:与 B 细胞标志物的关联。

Response to rituximab and timeframe to relapse in rheumatoid arthritis patients: association with B-cell markers.

机构信息

2nd Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Mol Diagn Ther. 2010 Feb 1;14(1):43-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03256352.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Rituximab is used to deplete B cells and control disease activity, mainly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have not responded to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. Response rates and time to relapse vary significantly among treated individuals. The objective of this study was to monitor the response of seropositive and seronegative RA patients to rituximab and correlate relapse with B-cell markers in the two groups.

METHODS

Seventeen RA patients (eight seropositive for rheumatoid factor [RF+] and nine seronegative [RF-]) were treated with two cycles of rituximab. After treatment, all patients were re-evaluated at the outpatient clinic, and rituximab was readministered when disease relapse was confirmed by clinical-laboratory measures (Disease Activity Score [DAS]-28). CD20+ cells and CD20 receptor expression levels were estimated at initiation, relapse, and re-evaluation timepoints, and were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Seropositive patients responded favorably to treatment compared with the seronegative group. The mean time to relapse was 337.5 +/- 127.0 days for the RF+ patients versus 233.3 +/- 59.6 days for the RF- patients (p = 0.043), despite more aggressive concomitant treatment in the seronegative group. The DAS28 decrease 3 months after treatment was 1.695 +/- 1.076 in seropositive patients versus 0.94 +/- 1.62 in seronegative patients. At relapse, CD20 receptor expression (molecules/cell) was higher in RF+ patients than in their RF- counterparts, despite a significantly lower percentage of CD20+ cells.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab treatment is efficient in both seropositive and seronegative RA. However, seropositive RA patients tend to respond favorably compared with seronegative patients. The differential CD20 receptor expression in the two groups at relapse potentially suggests a different pathogenetic mechanism of relapse and merits further investigation.

摘要

目的

利妥昔单抗可用于耗竭 B 细胞并控制疾病活动,主要用于未对肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)治疗产生反应的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者。治疗个体之间的反应率和复发时间差异很大。本研究的目的是监测血清阳性和血清阴性 RA 患者对利妥昔单抗的反应,并将两组的复发与 B 细胞标志物相关联。

方法

对 17 例 RA 患者(8 例类风湿因子 [RF]+和 9 例 RF-)进行了两个周期的利妥昔单抗治疗。治疗后,所有患者均在门诊重新进行评估,当通过临床实验室指标(DAS28)确认疾病复发时,再次给予利妥昔单抗。在起始、复发和重新评估时,分别估计 CD20+细胞和 CD20 受体表达水平,并在两组之间进行比较。

结果

与血清阴性组相比,血清阳性患者对治疗的反应更好。RF+患者的平均复发时间为 337.5+/-127.0 天,而 RF-患者为 233.3+/-59.6 天(p=0.043),尽管血清阴性组的联合治疗更为积极。治疗后 3 个月时,DAS28 下降 1.695+/-1.076 在 RF+患者中,而在 RF-患者中为 0.94+/-1.62。在复发时,尽管 RF+患者的 CD20+细胞比例明显较低,但 RF+患者的 CD20 受体表达(分子/细胞)高于 RF-患者。

结论

利妥昔单抗治疗对血清阳性和血清阴性 RA 均有效。然而,与血清阴性患者相比,血清阳性 RA 患者倾向于有更好的反应。两组在复发时的差异 CD20 受体表达可能提示复发的不同发病机制,值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验