Suppr超能文献

含氧化锆基底结构的固定义齿(Cercon)的四年临床结果:终端基牙与悬臂设计对比

Four-year clinical results of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia substructures (Cercon): end abutments vs. cantilever design.

作者信息

Wolfart Stefan, Harder Sönke, Eschbach Stefanie, Lehmann Frank, Kern Matthias

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;117(6):741-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00693.x.

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of three- to four-unit posterior all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) made of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia-polycrystal ceramic frameworks (CerconBase; Degudent). Fifty-eight restorations were placed in 48 patients. Twenty-four FDPs had an end abutment design (EAD) replacing 3 premolars and 21 molars. Thirty-four FDPs had a cantilever design (CD) replacing 11 premolars and 23 molars. The frameworks had a minimum proximal connector dimension of 3 x 3 mm. The fixed dental prostheses were cemented with glass-ionomer cement after air-abrading the inner crown surfaces. Three FDPs were defined as drop-outs. The mean observation period was 48 +/- 7 months for the EAD (21 patients/24 FDPs) and 50 +/- 14 months for the CD (25 patients/31 FDPs). The 4-yr survival rate, according to the Kaplan-Meier analyses, was 96% for the EAD and 92% for the CD. The technical complication rate was 13% for the EAD and 12% for the CD, and the biological complication rate was 21% for the EAD and 15% for the CD. For none of the analyses were significant differences found between both groups. After 4 yr the clinical outcome of three- to four-unit posterior FDPs with EAD and CD was promising.

摘要

本前瞻性研究的目的是评估由氧化钇稳定的四方多晶氧化锆陶瓷框架(CerconBase;Degudent)制成的三至四单位后牙全瓷固定义齿(FDP)的临床效果。48例患者共植入了58颗修复体。24颗FDP采用端基牙设计(EAD),替换3颗前磨牙和21颗磨牙。34颗FDP采用悬臂设计(CD),替换11颗前磨牙和23颗磨牙。框架近端连接体最小尺寸为3×3mm。在内冠表面进行空气喷砂处理后,用玻璃离子水门汀粘结固定义齿。3颗FDP被定义为失访病例。EAD组(21例患者/24颗FDP)的平均观察期为48±7个月,CD组(25例患者/31颗FDP)为50±14个月。根据Kaplan-Meier分析,EAD组4年生存率为96%,CD组为92%。EAD组技术并发症发生率为13%,CD组为12%;EAD组生物学并发症发生率为21%,CD组为15%。两组间各项分析均未发现显著差异。4年后,采用EAD和CD设计的三至四单位后牙FDP的临床效果良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验