School of Health Sciences, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Department of Biomaterials and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Aug;26(8):5129-5142. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04573-z. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
This systematic review was performed to determine the main cause of technical failure of tooth-supported zirconia crowns and fixed partial dentures (FPDs), categorizing them as fracture/chipping or loss of retention/decementation.
Electronic and manual searches were performed for randomized clinical trials, prospective clinical trials, and prospective cohort studies that reported the technical failure rates of zirconia restorations. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of the studies.
Fifty-two studies were included and most of them had unclear risk of bias. Considering all reported fractures/chipping, for veneered crowns with 1 to 3 years of follow-up, the relative risk (RR) of fracture in relation to loss or retention was 3.95 (95% CI 1.18-13.23; p = 0.03). For 4 to 6 years of follow-up, the RR was 5.44 (95% CI 1.41-20.92; p = 0.01). For veneered FPDs with 1 to 3 years of follow-up, the RR was 5.98 (95% CI 2.31-15.01; p = 0.0002). For 4 to 6 years of follow-up, the RR was 3.70 (95% CI 1.63-8.41; p = 0.002). For 7 years or more of follow-up, the RR was 3.45 (95% CI 1.84-6.46; p = 0.0001). When only framework fractures were considered, there were no significant differences for the RR in all follow-up periods (p > 0.05).
Higher RR for fracture/chipping in relation to decementation for veneered zirconia crowns and FPDs at all follow-up times. For framework fractures, no difference was observed between the risk of failure of the restoration due to fracture or decementation.
Zirconia crowns and FPDs showed relatively high success and survival rates. However, considering the technical failures, there is approximately four times higher chance of fracture/chipping than loss of retention for both single and multi-unit tooth-supported veneered zirconia restorations.
本系统评价旨在确定牙支持氧化锆冠和固定局部义齿(FPD)的主要技术失败原因,并将其分为碎裂/崩瓷或固位丧失/脱粘。
对报告氧化锆修复体技术失败率的随机临床试验、前瞻性临床试验和前瞻性队列研究进行了电子和手动检索。使用 Cochrane 协作风险偏倚工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。
共纳入 52 项研究,其中大多数研究的偏倚风险不明确。考虑到所有报告的碎裂/崩瓷情况,对于随访 1 至 3 年的饰面冠,与固位丧失相比,碎裂的相对风险(RR)为 3.95(95%CI 1.18-13.23;p=0.03)。对于随访 4 至 6 年,RR 为 5.44(95%CI 1.41-20.92;p=0.01)。对于随访 1 至 3 年的饰面 FPD,RR 为 5.98(95%CI 2.31-15.01;p=0.0002)。对于随访 4 至 6 年,RR 为 3.70(95%CI 1.63-8.41;p=0.002)。对于随访 7 年及以上,RR 为 3.45(95%CI 1.84-6.46;p=0.0001)。仅考虑支架碎裂时,在所有随访期间,RR 无显著差异(p>0.05)。
在所有随访时间内,饰面氧化锆冠和 FPD 的碎裂/崩瓷与脱粘的 RR 较高。对于支架碎裂,由于碎裂或脱粘导致修复体失效的风险无差异。
氧化锆冠和 FPD 显示出相对较高的成功率和存活率。然而,考虑到技术失败,单颗和多颗牙支持的饰面氧化锆修复体的碎裂/崩瓷的风险大约是固位丧失的四倍。