• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)管理的变化:EMMEPOC 研究。

Changes in management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care: EMMEPOC study.

机构信息

Servei de Pneumologia, Institut del Tòrax, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036-Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2010 Jan;104(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.08.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2009.08.003
PMID:20122630
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Changes in management of COPD in primary care were studied following a training exercise among Spanish general practitioners (GPs). The exercise involved dissemination of the Spanish Society for Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) guidelines. The use of a portable device to perform spirometry tests was evaluated to adequately categorize COPD and reduce other diagnostic interventions.

METHODS

A representative sample of GPs from general practices in Spain was recruited for the study. In phase I, GPs performed an initial evaluation of 5 patients with COPD. In phase II, GPs were randomly allocated to the following groups: 1) control group-G1 (GPs managing COPD according to usual clinical practice); 2) training group-G2 (dissemination of SEPAR guidelines); and 3) training group-G3 (dissemination of SEPAR guidelines and distribution of the Koko Peak Pro to measure FEV(1), FEV(6), and FEV(1)/FEV(6)).

RESULTS

Phase-I included 3254 physicians, who selected 16,024 patients. In phase II, 301 physicians in G1, 1182 in G2, and 1141 in G3 selected 1481, 5798, and 5556 patients respectively. Evaluation of the changes in COPD stratification according to the SEPAR guidelines showed that physicians in G1 adequately classified 60% of patients, compared to 69% in G2 and 88.5% in G3 (p<0.0001). On comparing groups G1 and G3, a significant reduction was seen in chest X-rays (from 42% to 32%, p=0.0002) and arterial blood gas studies performed (from 34% to 22%, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The dissemination of the SEPAR guidelines and the utilization of the portable device for spirometry may improve management of COPD in primary care.

摘要

背景

在西班牙全科医生(GP)进行了一项培训活动后,研究了对 COPD 管理的变化。该培训活动涉及了西班牙呼吸病学和胸腔外科学会(SEPAR)指南的传播。使用便携式设备进行肺功能测试的方法,旨在对 COPD 进行充分分类并减少其他诊断干预措施。

方法

从西班牙的一般实践中招募了代表性的 GP 样本进行这项研究。在第一阶段,GP 对 5 名 COPD 患者进行了初步评估。在第二阶段,GP 被随机分配到以下组别:1)对照组-G1(根据常规临床实践管理 COPD 的 GP);2)培训组-G2(传播 SEPAR 指南);3)培训组-G3(传播 SEPAR 指南和分发 Koko Peak Pro 以测量 FEV1、FEV6 和 FEV1/FEV6)。

结果

第一阶段包括 3254 名医生,他们选择了 16024 名患者。在第二阶段,G1 中有 301 名医生,G2 中有 1182 名医生,G3 中有 1141 名医生,分别选择了 1481、5798 和 5556 名患者。根据 SEPAR 指南评估 COPD 分层的变化表明,G1 中的医生对 60%的患者进行了适当分类,而 G2 中的医生为 69%,G3 中的医生为 88.5%(p<0.0001)。比较 G1 和 G3 两组,胸部 X 光片(从 42%降至 32%,p=0.0002)和动脉血气研究的数量(从 34%降至 22%,p<0.0001)显著减少。

结论

SEPAR 指南的传播和便携式设备用于肺功能测试可改善初级保健中的 COPD 管理。

相似文献

1
Changes in management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care: EMMEPOC study.基层医疗中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)管理的变化:EMMEPOC 研究。
Respir Med. 2010 Jan;104(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.08.003.
2
How often is diagnosis of COPD confirmed with spirometry?COPD 的诊断有多少次是通过肺功能检查( spirometry )来确认的?
Respir Med. 2010 Apr;104(4):550-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.10.023.
3
Under-diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study in primary care.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的漏诊:一项初级保健中的定性研究
Respir Med. 2008 May;102(5):738-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
4
Barriers to the use of spirometry in general practice.全科医疗中使用肺活量测定法的障碍。
Aust Fam Physician. 2005 Mar;34(3):201-3.
5
Comparison of a network of primary care physicians and an open spirometry programme for COPD diagnosis.初级保健医生网络与 COPD 诊断开放式肺量计计划的比较。
Respir Med. 2011 Feb;105(2):274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.06.020.
6
Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD opportunity for lung disorders.慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议:慢性阻塞性肺疾病的黄金机遇与肺部疾病。
Prev Med. 2005 Mar;40(3):274-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.06.010.
7
Misdiagnosis of COPD and asthma in primary care patients 40 years of age and over.40岁及以上初级保健患者中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘的误诊情况。
J Asthma. 2006 Jan-Feb;43(1):75-80. doi: 10.1080/02770900500448738.
8
[Accuracy of spirometry performed by general practitioners and pulmonologists in Pomeranian Region in the "Prevention of COPD" NHS program].[在“慢性阻塞性肺疾病预防”国家医疗服务计划中,波美拉尼亚地区全科医生和肺科医生进行的肺量计检查的准确性]
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2009;77(4):380-6.
9
A mixed methods study to compare models of spirometry delivery in primary care for patients at risk of COPD.一项比较初级保健中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)风险患者肺功能测定提供模式的混合方法研究。
Thorax. 2008 May;63(5):408-14. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.082859. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
10
Occupational health and general practice: from opportunities lost to opportunities capitalised?职业健康与全科医疗:从错失机遇到把握机遇?
Med Lav. 2006 Mar-Apr;97(2):288-94.

引用本文的文献

1
Educational interventions for health professionals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.针对初级保健中管理慢性阻塞性肺疾病的卫生专业人员的教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD012652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012652.pub2.
2
Gender differences in COPD management in a Sicilian general practice setting: a cohort study evaluating the impact of educational interventions.西西里岛全科医疗环境中慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理的性别差异:一项评估教育干预影响的队列研究
ERJ Open Res. 2020 Aug 17;6(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00279-2020. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Implementation Strategies for Non-communicable Disease Guidelines in Primary Health Care.
系统评价和荟萃分析:初级卫生保健中非传染性疾病指南实施策略的有效性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1142-1154. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4435-5. Epub 2018 May 4.
4
Improvement in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease following a clinical educational program: results from a prospective cohort study in the Sicilian general practice setting.临床教育项目对慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理的改善:西西里普通实践环境中前瞻性队列研究的结果。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2018 Mar 23;28(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41533-018-0077-7.
5
COPD management in primary care: is an educational plan for GPs useful?基层医疗中的慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理:针对全科医生的教育计划有用吗?
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2013 Mar 19;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-8-24.
6
Relation between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and antibiotics.慢性阻塞性肺疾病与抗生素的关系。
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2012 Jun;14(3):300-7. doi: 10.1007/s11908-012-0255-7.
7
Guideline-based survey of outpatient COPD management by pulmonary specialists in Germany.德国肺病专家基于指南对门诊 COPD 管理的调查。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:101-8. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S27887. Epub 2012 Feb 14.