Tipton R T, Rinchuse D J
University of Pittsburgh, School of Dental Medicine, Dept. of Orthodontics, PA 15261.
Angle Orthod. 1991 Spring;61(1):57-66. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0057:TRBSOA>2.0.CO;2.
The relationship between static occlusion and functional occlusion was evaluated in 101 dental and dental hygiene students. The sample was selected from a population of 467 students who were enrolled at one dental school during the 1987-1988 academic year based upon the following criteria: age range 18 to 32 years; caucasian race; no prior orthodontic treatment; at least 28 natural teeth present; no occlusal adjustments; and no large restorations, crowns or bridges. Fifty-two (52) of the subjects possessed "normal" static occlusion, 26 had a Class I malocclusion, 16 were found to have a Class II malocclusion, and 7 had a Class III malocclusion. The majority (i.e., 75%) of the 101 subjects possessed non-working (balancing) functional contacts. Seventy-five (75) of the subjects possessed balanced occlusion, nine had canine-protected occlusion, nine possessed group function occlusion, and eight had mixed canine-protected/group functional occlusion. This study found no statistically significant relationship between static occlusion and functional occlusion, however, there was a trend for balanced occlusion to be more often associated with "normal" (ideal) static occlusion.
对101名牙科和口腔卫生专业学生的静态咬合与功能性咬合之间的关系进行了评估。该样本从1987 - 1988学年在一所牙科学院注册的467名学生中选取，依据以下标准：年龄范围18至32岁；白种人；无正畸治疗史；至少有28颗天然牙；无咬合调整；无大型修复体、牙冠或牙桥。52名受试者具有“正常”静态咬合，26名有I类错颌，16名被发现有II类错颌，7名有III类错颌。101名受试者中的大多数（即75%）具有非工作侧（平衡）功能性接触。75名受试者具有平衡咬合，9名有尖牙保护型咬合，9名具有组牙功能咬合，8名有混合性尖牙保护型/组牙功能咬合。本研究发现静态咬合与功能性咬合之间无统计学显著关系，然而，存在一种趋势，即平衡咬合更常与“正常”（理想）静态咬合相关。
