Malik Richard, Ward Michael P, Seavers Aine, Fawcett Anne, Bell Erin, Govendir Merran, Page Stephen
Centre for Veterinary Education; Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
J Feline Med Surg. 2010 Jan;12(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2009.12.002.
SURVEY AIMS: A questionnaire was sent to veterinarians in Australia to determine the approximate number of cats presenting for permethrin spot-on (PSO) intoxication over a 2-year period.
Of the 269 questionnaires returned, 255 were eligible for analysis. A total of 207 respondents (81%) reported cases of PSO intoxication in cats over the previous 2 years. In total, 750 individual cases were reported, with 166 deaths. While all deaths were generally attributable to intoxication, 39 cats were euthanased because owners were unable to pay the anticipated treatment costs. Brands of PSO implicated included Exelpet Flea (and Tick) Liquidator (Mars Australia) (146 respondents), Bayer Advantix (48), Purina Totalcare Flea Eliminator Line-On (19), Troy Ease-On (six) and Duogard Line-On (Virbac) (four); 67 respondents were not able to identify a specific product. Permethrin spot-on formulations were most commonly obtained from supermarkets (146 respondents), followed by pet stores (43), veterinary practices (16), and a range of other sources including produce stores and friends. The majority of intoxication cases reported involved PSOs labelled for use in dogs with specific label instructions such as 'toxic to cats'. Owners applied these PSO products to their cats accidentally or intentionally. In some cases, exposure was through secondary contact, such as when a PSO product was applied to a dog with which a cat had direct or indirect contact.
In the authors' view, because of the likelihood of inappropriate use and toxicity in the non-labelled species, over-the-counter products intended for use in either dogs or cats must have a high margin of safety in all species. Furthermore, PSOs should only be available at points of sale where veterinary advice can be provided and appropriate warnings given. As an interim measure, modified labelling with more explicit warnings may reduce morbidity and mortality.
调查目的:向澳大利亚的兽医发送了一份调查问卷,以确定在两年时间内出现氯菊酯滴剂(PSO)中毒的猫的大致数量。
在回收的269份调查问卷中,有255份符合分析条件。共有207名受访者(81%)报告了过去两年中猫的PSO中毒病例。总共报告了750例个体病例,其中166例死亡。虽然所有死亡通常都归因于中毒,但有39只猫因主人无法支付预期的治疗费用而被安乐死。涉及的PSO品牌包括Exelpet Flea(和Tick)Liquidator(澳大利亚玛氏公司)(146名受访者)、拜耳Advantix(48例)、普瑞纳Totalcare Flea Eliminator Line-On(19例)、Troy Ease-On(6例)和Duogard Line-On(维克)(4例);67名受访者无法确定具体产品。氯菊酯滴剂制剂最常从超市获得(146名受访者),其次是宠物店(43例)、兽医诊所(16例)以及包括农产品店和朋友在内的一系列其他来源。报告的大多数中毒病例涉及标有用于狗的特定标签说明(如“对猫有毒”)的PSO。主人意外或故意将这些PSO产品应用于他们的猫。在某些情况下,接触是通过二次接触,例如当PSO产品应用于猫直接或间接接触的狗时。
作者认为,由于在未标注的物种中存在不当使用和毒性的可能性,用于狗或猫的非处方产品在所有物种中必须具有高安全系数。此外,PSO应该只在能够提供兽医建议并给出适当警告的销售点提供。作为一项临时措施,带有更明确警告的修改标签可能会降低发病率和死亡率。